Visual detectability gradients: Effect of high-speed visual experience

Abstract

The detectability of a target pattern presented briefly with a number of similar nontarget patterns varies as a function of the spatial location of the target. Previous work attributes these detectability gradients to a visual search process—a non-eye movement serial scan—that examines a decaying neural representation of the image. ( Heron, 1957 Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1987 Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1990a Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1990b Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1990c Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1990a Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1990b Efron, Yund, & Nichols, 1990c. The results reported in the companion paper ( Ostrosky-Solis, Efron, & Yund, 1991) indicated that literacy did not affect overall performance levels but did influence scanning behavior: “… reading, or learning to read, caused the scanning mechanisms of literate subjects to adopt more consistent scan paths, from subject to subject, than they would have adopted without this reading experience.” The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the effect on this scanning mechanism, if any, of an entirely different type of visual experience —the high-speed visual processing required of tennis players. Unlike reading which requires the linguistic interpretation of a highly structured visual input, tennis skill requires rapid target detection and tracking in three-dimensional visual space as well as large scale visual-motor coordination. As in the previous experiments, subjects were required to detect a vertical stripe pattern among a number of similar non-target patterns. The experiment was performed on a group of 52 tennis players and on an age- and sex-matched group of 52 non-tennis players. The overall accuracy of target detection was greater among the tennis players than among the non-tennis players and, of more interest, there was a significant difference in the detectability gradients. The detection advantage of the tennis group seemed to reach its maximum in the first half of the scan and then to deteriorate as the scan proceeded. These results indicate that visual experience other than reading can affect the habitual activity of the scanning mechanism.