Abstract

Over the past few decades, China has gone through a number of changes, and no community has been more impacted by these changes than the rural community. This paper takes a look at how heritage influences rural communities in these turbulent times. The paper focuses on three ways in which heritage is present in rural communities: Ecomuseums, rural tourism and archaeological heritage. While there are differences between all three modes, their similarities are defined by common issues addressed in this paper, such as the persisting top-down approaches, traditions in government systems, and issues native to rural areas that prevent active participation in heritage and sustainable tourism.

Highlights

  • Over the past few decades, Chinese rural communities have experienced fundamental changes, and have been struggling to find their footing in the midst of the social and economic turmoil of the new era

  • Since there is a discrepancy in terms of the available publications that focus on the ways in which archaeology influences rural communities, the analysis of the relationship between archaeology and rural areas will be observed through these three sites

  • This paper discusses changes in China’s rural areas and the impact of heritage on those changes, and it is only fair to concede that heritage has a limited reach in what are currently very challenging times

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past few decades, Chinese rural communities have experienced fundamental changes, and have been struggling to find their footing in the midst of the social and economic turmoil of the new era. The paper focuses on the most common way in which heritage is present in rural areas: Tourism. This paper discusses three aspects of the participation and development of heritage in rural areas: Ecomuseums, tourist villages, and archaeological heritage. The aim of this study is to research the relationship between heritage and rural communities, and to contribute to the ongoing discussion about the future of the Chinese village from the perspective of heritage work. The extensive research conducted at such tourist sites allows for a broader insight into the current conditions of heritage in rural communities across the country. In order to fill the gap in this field of research, this paper focuses on the relationship between archaeology and the local community at three major archaeological sites in

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.