Vibrio parahaemolyticus: Basic Techniques for Growth, Genetic Manipulation, and Analysis of Virulence Factors.

The storage root crop cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is predicted to remain central to future food and economic security for smallholder farming households and agricultural output in the tropics. Genetic improvement of cassava is required to meet changing farmer and consumer needs, evolving pests and diseases, and challenges presented by climate change. Transgenic and genome editing technologies offer significant potential for introducing desired traits into farmer-preferred varieties and breeding lines, and for studying the biology of this under-investigated crop species. A bottleneck in implementing genetic modification in this species has been access to robust methods for transformation of cassava cultivars and landraces. In this article, we provide a detailed protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cassava and regeneration of genetically modified plants. Basic Protocol 1 describes how to establish and micropropagate in vitro cassava plantlets, and Alternate Protocol 1 details how to establish in vitro cultures from field or greenhouse cuttings. Basic Protocol 2 describes all steps necessary for genetic transformation in the model variety 60444, and Alternate Protocol 2 provides details for modifying this method for use with other cultivars. Finally, Basic Protocol 3 describes how to establish plants produced via Basic Protocol 2 and Alternate Protocol 2 in soil in a greenhouse. These methods have proven applications across more than a dozen genotypes and are capable of producing transgenic and gene-edited plants for experimental purposes, for testing under greenhouse and field conditions, and for development of plants suitable for subsequent regulatory approval and product deployment. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Establishment and propagation of in vitro cassava plantlets Alternate Protocol 1: Establishment of in vitro plants from field or greenhouse plants Basic Protocol 2: Genetic transformation of cassava variety 60444 Alternate Protocol 2: Genetic transformation of additional cultivars Basic Protocol 3: Establishment and growth of plants in the greenhouse.

This article presents assays that allow induction and measurement of activation of different inflammasomes in mouse macrophages, human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures, and mouse peritonitis and endotoxic shock models. Basic Protocol 1 describes how to prime the inflammasome in mouse macrophages with different Toll-like receptor agonists and TNF-α; how to induce NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRC4, and AIM2 inflammasome activation by their corresponding stimuli; and how to measure inflammasome activation-mediated maturation of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 and pyroptosis. Since the well-established agonists for NLRP1 are inconsistent between mice and humans, Basic Protocol 2 describes how to activate the NLRP1 inflammasome in human PBMCs. Basic Protocol 3 describes how to purify, crosslink, and detect the apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC) pyroptosome. Formation of the ASC pyroptosome is a signature of inflammasome activation. A limitation of ASC pyroptosome detection is the requirement of a relatively large cell number. Alternate Protocol 1 is provided to stain ASC pyroptosomes using an anti-ASC antibody and to measure ASC specks by fluorescence microscopy in a single cell. Intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and inflammasome agonists will induce peritonitis, which is seen as an elevation of IL-1β and other proinflammatory cytokines and an infiltration of neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes. Basic Protocol 4 describes how to induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation and peritonitis by priming mice with LPS and subsequently challenging them with monosodium urate (MSU). The method for measuring cytokines in serum and through peritoneal lavage is also described. Finally, Alternate Protocol 2 describes how to induce noncanonical NLRP3 inflammasome activation by high-dose LPS challenge in a sepsis model. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Priming and activation of inflammasomes in mouse macrophages Basic Protocol 2: Activation of human NLRP1 inflammasome by DPP8/9 inhibitor talabostat Basic Protocol 3: Purification and detection of ASC pyroptosome Alternate Protocol 1: Detection of ASC speck by immunofluorescence staining Basic Protocol 4: Activation of canonical NLRP3 inflammasome in mice by intraperitoneal delivery of MSU crystals Alternate Protocol 2: Activation of noncanonical NLRP3 inflammasome in mice by intraperitoneal delivery of LPS.

The blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, is a devastating plant pathogen that threatens global food security. The social and economic importance of blast disease has contributed to this filamentous fungus becoming a model organism for the study of host‐pathogen interactions. Availability of the complete genome sequences of many strains of the pathogen, as well as rice and wheat cultivars, coupled with the tractability of M. oryzae to classical and molecular genetic manipulation have contributed to its widespread study. Although M. oryzae has been extensively investigated for the past two decades, procedures for storing, maintaining, and manipulating the blast fungus in the laboratory had not been compiled and updated. As a consequence, there is considerable disparity in how the fungus is stored and manipulated between studies. In this article, we present a collection of protocols providing clear explanations of how to preserve filter stocks of M. oryzae; how to grow the fungus in both liquid and solid media; how to extract genomic DNA from fungal mycelium; how to induce appressorium formation on coverslips for visualization and tissue collection; and how to perform two distinct types of plant infection assay for virulence assessment. By sharing our most used laboratory procedures, we aim to address some of the knowledge gaps in current M. oryzae protocols and contribute to uniformity and robustness in studies by the Magnaporthe research community. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Storage of M. oryzae strains Basic Protocol 2: Revival and regular maintenance of M. oryzae cultures in solid medium Alternate Protocol 1: Regular maintenance of M. oryzae cultures in liquid medium Basic Protocol 3: Genomic DNA extraction from M. oryzae mycelium Alternate Protocol 2: Quick DNA extraction from M. oryzae mycelium Basic Protocol 4: M. oryzae induction of appressorium development on glass coverslips for microscopy Alternate Protocol 3: M. oryzae induction of appressorium development on glass coverslips for tissue collection Basic Protocol 5: M. oryzae rice infection assay through spray inoculation Alternate Protocol 4: M. oryzae leaf‐drop plant infection assay

The emergence of covalent inhibitors and chemoproteomic probes in translational chemical biology research requires the development of robust biophysical and analytical methods to characterize their complex interactions with target biomolecules. Importantly, these methods must efficiently assess target selectivity and accurately discern noncovalent binding from the formation of resultant covalent adducts. One recently reported covalent chemical tool used in tumor immune oncology, covalent immune recruiters (CIRs), increases the proximity of immune cells and cancer cells, promoting immune recognition and response. Herein we describe biolayer interferometry (BLI) biosensor, flow cytometry, and solution fluorescence-based assay approaches to characterize CIR:antibody binding and CIR-antibody covalent-labeling kinetics. BLI technology, akin to surface plasmon resonance, provides the unique opportunity to investigate molecular binding and labeling kinetics both on a solid surface (Basic Protocol 1) and in solution (Alternate Protocol 1). Here, recruitment of mass-containing proteins to the BLI probe via CIR is measured with high sensitivity and is used as a readout of CIR labeling activity. Further, CIR technology is used to label antibodies with a fluorescent handle. In this system, labeling is monitored via SDS-PAGE with a fluorescence gel imager, where increased fluorescence intensity of a sample reflects increased labeling (Basic Protocol 2). Analysis of CIR:antibody target-specific immune activation is demonstrated with a flow cytometry-based antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) assay (Basic Protocol 3). This ADCP protocol may be further used to discern CIR:antibody binding from covalent adduct formation (Alternate Protocol 3). For the protocols described, each method may be used to analyze characteristics of any covalent-tagging or antibody-recruiting small molecule or protein-based technology. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Determining "on-probe" reaction kinetics of CIR1/CIR4 via biolayer interferometry with Octet RED96 Alternate Protocol 1: Determining "in-solution" reaction kinetics of prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting CIR (CIR3) via biolayer interferometry with Octet RED96 Basic Protocol 2: Reaction kinetics of covalently labeled antibodies via fluorescence SDS-PAGE Basic Protocol 3: Small molecule-directed antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis on live human cells measured via flow cytometry Alternate Protocol 2: Kinetic analysis of CIR3:antibody labeling via antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis on flow cytometry Support Protocol 1: Activation of U937 monocytes with interferon γ Support Protocol 2: Labeling streptavidin beads with biotinylated prostate-specific membrane antigen receptor.

Southern blotting is the transfer of DNA fragments from an electrophoresis gel to a membrane support (the properties and advantages of the different types of membrane, transfer buffer, and transfer method are discussed in detail), resulting in immobilization of the DNA fragments, so the membrane carries a semipermanent reproduction of the banding pattern of the gel. After immobilization, the DNA can be subjected to hybridization analysis, enabling bands with sequence similarity to a labeled probe to be identified. This appendix describes Southern blotting via upward capillary transfer of DNA from an agarose gel onto a nylon or nitrocellulose membrane, using a high‐salt transfer buffer to promote binding of DNA to the membrane. With the high‐salt buffer, the DNA becomes bound to the membrane during transfer but not permanently immobilized. Immobilization is achieved by UV irradiation (for nylon) or baking (for nitrocellulose). A describes how to calibrate a UV transilluminator for optimal UV irradiation of a nylon membrane. An alternate protocol details transfer using nylon membranes and an alkaline buffer, and is primarily used with positively charged nylon membranes. The advantage of this combination is that no post‐transfer immobilization step is required, as the positively charged membrane binds DNA irreversibly under alkaline transfer conditions. The method can also be used with neutral nylon membranes but less DNA will be retained. A second alternate protocol describes a transfer method based on a different transfer‐stack setup. The traditional method of upward capillary transfer of DNA from gel to membrane described in the first basic and alternate protocols has certain disadvantages, notably the fact that the gel can become crushed by the weighted filter papers and paper towels that are laid on top of it. This slows down the blotting process and may reduce the amount of DNA that can be transferred. The downward capillary method described in the second alternate protocol is therefore more rapid than the basic protocol and can result in more complete transfer. Although the ease and reliability of capillary transfer methods makes this far and away the most popular system for Southern blotting with agarose gels, it unfortunately does not work with polyacrylamide gels, whose smaller pore size impedes the transverse movement of the DNA molecules. The third alternate protocol describes an electroblotting procedure that is currently the most reliable method for transfer of DNA from a polyacrylamide gel. Dot and slot blotting are also described.

Expression of genes is manifested by the production of RNA transcripts within cells. Hybridization histochemistry (or in situ hybridization) permits localization of these transcripts with cellular resolution or better. Furthermore, the relative amounts of transcripts detected in different tissues or in the same tissues in different states (e.g., physiological or developmental) may be quantified. This unit describes hybridization histochemical techniques using either oligodeoxynucleotide probes (see Basic Protocols 1 and 2, Alternate Protocol 1) or RNA probes (riboprobes; see Basic Protocols 3 and 5). These methods include a more recent approach using commercially available sets of oligodeoxynucleotide pairs for colorimetric and fluorescent detection (see Basic Protocol 2), as well as a method for detection of the Y chromosome using either mouse or human riboprobes (see Basic Protocol 5). Additional methods include colorimetric detection (see Basic Protocol 4) and tyramide signal amplification (TSA) of digoxigenin-labeled probes (see Alternate Protocol 2), and autoradiographic detection of radiolabeled probes (see Basic Protocol 6). Finally, methods are provided for labeling oligodeoxynucleotide (see Support Protocol 1) and RNA (see Support Protocol 2) probes, and verifying the probes by northern analysis (see Support Protocol 3).

Galleria mellonella larvae are widely used for microbiological and toxicological studies due to their reproducibility of results, low costs, and ease of handling. Despite these advantages, the maintenance of homogeneous colonies of G. mellonella in laboratory rearing can face many challenges. We proposed a standardized protocol for the incubation of G. mellonella eggs, aiming to enhance larval development and provide a consistent and accessible experimental model for microbiological research. One Basic Protocol and two Alternate Protocols were established to simulate different conditions for maintaining and activating G. mellonella eggs. Basic Protocol, titled "Traditional group (TG)," follows our conventional protocol for egg activation with eggs being collected and stored at 27°C throughout the culture period; Alternate Protocol 1, titled "Immediate group (IG)," where eggs are stored after collection at 16°C for 120 days before being incubated at 27°C; and Alternate Protocol 2, titled "Gradual group (GG)," where the incubation temperature is gradually reduced from 27° to 16°C at a rate of 0.5°C per day, requiring 22 days to reach the target temperature. The eggs are then held at 16°C until day 76, after which the temperature is gradually increased back to 27°C at the same rate, for a total incubation time of 120 days. As a result, temperature fluctuations significantly delayed larval development in both IG and GG groups. Notably, larvae in the IG condition exhibited altered phenotypes, including abnormal pigmentation and a reduced ability to form cocoons. In contrast, despite the developmental delay, larvae in the GG condition displayed phenotypes comparable to those in the TG group. We propose that when conventional egg activation protocol (TG) is not feasible for laboratory rearing, gradual and controlled temperature changes (GG conditions) can serve as an effective alternative to prolonged egg development, as larvae from TG and GG exhibit comparable phenotype profiles. © 2025 The Author(s). Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Traditional group (TG) Alternate Protocol 1: Immediate group (IG) Alternate Protocol 2: Gradual group (GG).

The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) is a comprehensive resource for protein sequence and annotation data (UniProt Consortium, 2023). The UniProt website receives about 800,000 unique visitors per month and is the primary means to access UniProt. Along with various datasets that you can search, UniProt provides four main tools. These are the "BLAST" tool for sequence similarity searching, the "Align" tool for multiple sequence alignment, the "Peptide Search" tool for retrieving proteins containing a short peptide sequence, and the "Retrieve/ID Mapping" tool for using a list of identifiers to retrieve UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB) proteins and to convert database identifiers from UniProt to external databases or vice versa. This article provides four basic protocols and seven alternate protocols for using UniProt tools. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) in UniProt Alternate Protocol 1: BLAST through UniProt text search results pages Alternate Protocol 2: BLAST through UniProt basket Basic Protocol 2: Multiple sequence alignment in UniProt Alternate Protocol 3: Align tool through UniProt results pages and entry pages Alternate Protocol 4: Align tool through UniProt basket Basic Protocol 3: Peptide search in UniProt Basic Protocol 4: Batch retrieval and ID mapping in UniProt Alternate Protocol 5: Retrieve/ID Mapping tool through UniProt text search results pages and BLAST and Align results pages Alternate Protocol 6: Retrieve/ID Mapping tool through UniProt basket Alternate Protocol 7: Retrieve/ID Mapping tool through UniProt search box.

Vibrio fischeri is a nonpathogenic organism related to pathogenic Vibrio species that can be readily grown and stored with common laboratory equipment. In this article, protocols for routine growth, storage, and phenotypic assessment of V. fischeri, as well as recipes for useful media, are included. Specifically, this article describes procedures and considerations for growth of this microbe in complex and minimal media. It also describes assays for biofilm formation, motility, and bioluminescence, three commonly assessed phenotypes of V. fischeri. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Growth of V. fischeri from frozen stocks Basic Protocol 2: Growth of V. fischeri in rich, undefined liquid medium Alternate Protocol 1: Growth of V. fischeri in minimal medium Basic Protocol 3: Storage of V. fischeri in frozen stocks Basic Protocol 4: Biofilm assay on solid agar Alternate Protocol 2: Biofilm assay in shaking liquid culture Alternate Protocol 3: Biofilm assay in static liquid culture Basic Protocol 5: Motility assay Basic Protocol 6: Luminescence assay.

Coccidioidomycosis ("Valley fever") is caused by Coccidioides immitis and C. posadasii. These fungi are thermally dimorphic, cycling between mycelia and arthroconidia in the environment and converting into spherules and endospores within a host. Coccidioides can cause a broad spectrum of disease that can be difficult to treat. There has been a steady increase in disease, with an estimated 350,000 new infections per year in the United States. With the increase in disease and difficulty in treatment, there is an unmet need to increase research in basic biology and identify new treatments, diagnostics, and vaccine candidates. Here, we describe protocols required in any Coccidioides laboratory, such as growing, harvesting, and storing the different stages of this dimorphic fungal pathogen. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Growth and harvest of liquid mycelia cultures for extractions Alternate Protocol 1: Large-volume growth and harvest of liquid mycelia cultures Basic Protocol 2: Mycelial growth on solid medium Alternate Protocol 2: Maintaining mycelial growth on solid medium Basic Protocol 3: Harvesting and quantification of arthroconidia Alternate Protocol 3: Long-term storage of arthroconidia Basic Protocol 4: Parasitic spherule growth and harvest Alternate Protocol 4: Obtaining endospores from spherules Basic Protocol 5: Intranasal infection of murine models.

In the event of a sunlight-blocking, temperature-lowering global catastrophe, such as a global nuclear war, super-volcano eruption or large asteroid strike, normal agricultural practices would be severely disrupted with a devastating impact on the global food supply. Despite the improbability of such an occurrence, it is prudent to consider how to sustain the surviving population following a global catastrophe until normal weather and climate patterns resume. Additionally, the ongoing challenges posed by climate change, droughts, flooding, soil salinization, and famine highlight the importance of developing food systems with resilient inputs such as lignocellulosic biomass. With its high proportion of cellulose, the abundant lignocellulosic biomass found across the Earth's land surfaces could be a source of energy and nutrition, but it would first need to be converted into foods. To understand the potential of lignocellulosic biomass to provide energy and nutrition to humans in post-catastrophic and other food crisis scenarios, compositional analyses should be completed to gauge the amount of energy (soluble sugars) and other macronutrients (protein and lipids) that might be available and the level of difficulty in extracting them. Suitable preparation of the lignocellulosic biomass is critical to achieve consistent and comparable results from these analyses. Here we describe a compilation of protocols to prepare lignocellulosic biomass and analyze its composition to understand its potential as a precursor to produce post-catastrophic foods which are those that could be foraged, grown, or produced under the new climate conditions to supplement reduced availability of traditional foods. These foods have sometimes been referred to in the literature as emergency, alternate, or resilient foods. © 2024 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Convection oven drying (1 to 2 days) Alternate Protocol 1: Air-drying (2 to 3 days) Alternate Protocol 2: Lyophilization (1 to 4 days) Support Protocol 1: Milling plant biomass Support Protocol 2: Measuring moisture content Basic Protocol 2: Cellulose determination Basic Protocol 3: Lignin determination Basic Protocol 4: Crude protein content by total nitrogen Basic Protocol 5: Crude fat determination via soxtec extraction system Basic Protocol 6: Sugars by HPLC Basic Protocol 7: Ash content.

Tissue glycans usually contain various structures, from simple to highly complicated, in different quantities. N-Glycans are particularly heterogeneous, with up to pentaantennary structures, different branch sequences, and several isomeric structures. 2-Aminopyridine (PA) tagging on released N-glycans is useful for separating isomers and to quantitatively analyze both the major and minor glycan structures in tissues using reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) and MS/MS analysis. Because the structural differences of PA-N-glycans influence their retention on a reversed-phase C18 column, it is easy to deduce the core structure, including core Fuc and bisecting GlcNAc as well as the branching pattern of each PA-N-glycan, based on the results of elution position, full MS, and MS/MS analysis. If more detailed structural analysis is required, combining sequential exoglycosidase digestions, sialic acid linkage-specific alkylamidation (SALSA), and/or SALSA/permethylation is useful for determining glycosidic linkages of branches. This article includes detailed protocols for the preparation of N-glycans released from glycoproteins/glycopeptides by glycoamidase F or hydrazinolysis, PA-tagging of N-glycans, fractionation with anion-exchange chromatography, and chemical or enzymatic modifications of PA-N-glycans, as well as reversed-phase LC-MS, MS/MS, and MSn analysis of PA-N-glycans from tissues. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of released N-glycans from tissue samples using glycoamidase F Alternate Protocol: Preparation of released N-glycans from tissue samples by hydrazinolysis Basic Protocol 2: PA-tagging of N-glycans and sample cleanup Support Protocol 1: Monitoring of PA-N-glycans using normal-phase HPLC Basic Protocol 3: Anion-exchange chromatography of PA-N-glycans Basic Protocol 4: Sequential exoglycosidase digestions Basic Protocol 5: Determination of Sia-linkages by SALSA Support Protocol 2: Cotton-HILIC solid-phase extraction to remove reagents for alkylamidation Basic Protocol 6: Sequential modifications of glycans with SALSA and permethylation Basic Protocol 7: LC-MS and MS/MS analysis of PA-N-glycans (before permethylation) Basic Protocol 8: LC-MS, MS/MS, and MSn analysis of PA-N-glycans (after permethylation).

Skeletal muscle tissue regeneration requires quiescent satellite cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation. Regenerative capacity of satellite cells can be studied in vitro by differentiating under low-serum conditions (2% to 5%) to form multinucleated myotubes. Myotubes are fixed and stained, and indices of differentiation are quantified. Jenner and Giemsa stains are typically used for myotube staining; however, this staining process can be variable depending on factors such as stain pH, staining time, and time since stain preparation. This article includes protocols for myoblast isolation, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro; Jenner-Giemsa staining; HEMA 3 staining; and quantification. Representative images using each staining method and quantification are included. The protocols identify critical steps and considerations for cell culture and each staining method and provide an even simpler alternative to Jenner-Giemsa staining. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol 1: Primary myoblast isolation Alternate Protocol 1: Plating cryopreserved myoblasts Basic Protocol 2: Myoblast passage and expansion Basic Protocol 3: Myoblast differentiation Basic Protocol 4: HEMA 3 staining Alternate Protocol 2: Jenner-Giemsa staining Basic Protocol 5: Quantification of myotube density Basic Protocol 6: Quantification of fusion index Basic Protocol 7: Quantification of myotubes per field.

Hemostasis is a defense mechanism for preventing fluid loss in an injured organism with a circulatory system. In mammals, it begins at the site of the injury, with platelet adhesion to components of thesubendothelial matrix activating a series of platelet signaling events that ultimately form a primary hemostatic plug. This process is followed by coagulation cascade activation, leading to fibrin formation and reinforcement of the plug. Thrombosis, an intravascular form of fibrin formation, is unpredictable and often associated with severe pain. Despite decades of research, many hemostatic and thrombotic factors remain unknown. To address this, we introduced zebrafish as a genetic model for studying thrombosis and pain. The piggyback knockdown method is used to knock down genes related to hemostasis and other biochemical or physiological pathways. Blood collection in zebrafish is important in characterizing hemostasis mutants such as hemophilia, in assaying blood coagulation, and in counting thrombocytes in diseases such as thrombocytopenia. FACS analysis is used to study thrombocyte development. Thrombocyte aggregation by flow cytometry and a plate tilt method is used in the functional evaluation of thrombocytes in hemostasis. Defects in coagulation can be studied by kinetic blood coagulation assays and bleeding assays. Laser thrombosis is a global assay that measures blood clotting, thrombocyte function, and endothelial function, including stasis. This technique is useful when screening for genes affecting hemostasis in a genome-wide manner. As pain is sensed by the PAR2 receptor, the trypsin aversion assay detects this pathway and can be used to identify genes related to pain pathways. © 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Gene silencing by piggyback knockdown Basic Protocol 2: Blood collection from adult zebrafish Basic Protocol 3: Quantification of thrombocytes by FACS analysis Basic Protocol 4: Thrombocyte aggregation assay by flow cytometry Alternate Protocol 1: Whole-blood aggregation assay by the plate tilt method Basic Protocol 5: Kinetic blood coagulation assays Support Protocol: Preparation of zebrafish thromboplastin Basic Protocol 6: Laser thrombosis assay Basic Protocol 7: Chemically induced gill bleeding assay Alternate Protocol 2: Mechanically induced bleeding assay Basic Protocol 8: Trypsin aversion assay in zebrafish larvae.

Proteomics and phosphoproteomics are robust tools to analyze dynamics of post-transcriptional processes during growth and development. A variety of experimental methods and workflows have been published, but most of them were developed for model plants and have not been adapted to high-throughput platforms. Here, we describe an experimental workflow for proteome and phosphoproteome studies tailored to cereal crop tissues. The workflow consists of two parallel parts that are suitable for analyzing protein/phosphoprotein from total proteins and the microsomal membrane fraction. We present phosphoproteomic data regarding quantification coverage and analytical reproducibility for example preparations from maize root and shoot, wheat leaf, and a microsomal protein preparation from maize leaf. To enable users to adjust for tissue specific requirements, we provide two different methods of protein clean-up: traditional ethanol precipitation (PC) and a recently developed technology termed single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3). Both the PC and SP3 methods are effective in the removal of unwanted substances in total protein crude extracts. In addition, two different methods of phosphopeptide enrichment are presented: a TiO2 -based method and Fe(III)-NTA cartridges on a robotized platform. Although the overall number of phosphopeptides is stable across protein clean-up and phosphopeptide enrichment methods, there are differences in the preferred phosphopeptides in each enrichment method. The preferred protocol depends on laboratory capabilities and research objective. © 2022 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Total protein crude extraction Basic Protocol 2: Total protein clean-up with ethanol precipitation Alternate Protocol 1: Total protein clean-up with SP3 method Basic Protocol 3: Microsomal fraction protein extraction Basic Protocol 4: Protein concentration determination by Bradford assay Basic Protocol 5: In-solution digestion with trypsin Basic Protocol 6: Phosphopeptide enrichment with TiO2 Alternate Protocol 2: Phosphopeptide enrichment with Fe(III)-NTA cartridges Basic Protocol 7: Peptide desalting with C18 material Basic Protocol 8: LC-MS/MS analysis of (phospho)peptides and spectrum matching.