Abstract
The "isolated" or island foundation concept is commonly used at high-end imaging suites (SEM, TEM, SPM, NMR), with the goal of reducing vibration at sensitive instrumentation. The operating theory is that, by separating the foundation supporting the instrument from the rest of the building foundation, the transmission of vibrations from environmental, mechanical, and other local sources, will be reduced. But is this concept truly effective at reducing vibration transmission from all or any of these sources? And if so, are the benefits present over the entire frequency range of interest or only limited to a narrow range of frequencies? This paper discusses the vibration performance of the island foundation concept and presents field data collected in four different settings. Data from three national laboratories and a commercial science facility are used to illustrate the benefits and disadvantages of this concept, in both the vertical and horizontal directions, for environmental, mechanical, and other local sources.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.