Abstract
Abstract Vertical motions over the western and central United States during 19–21 August 1961 were computed by several methods. The resulting angles applicable, at 700 mb or 10,000 ft (600 mb for the Joint Numerical Weather Prediction vertical motion fields) were compared both subjectively and objectively to each other, to the corresponding standard type cloud and weather observations, and to approximately synoptic TIROS nephanalyses. The results of the comparisons showed only moderate agreement among the various methods and between the vertical motion analyses and the TIROS information. The component method, based on observed winds, appeared to give the best agreement with the satellite picture indications of vertical motion, though it seemed little better than some of the other methods. The use of satellite data shows definite promise as a means of evaluating computed vertical motion fields and should eventually contribute to the improvement of the procedures used to compute motions. A lag, or “trailing...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.