Abstract
A volumetric approach to quantitative single-energy computed tomography (CT) of the spine for trabecular bone evaluation was compared with the accepted single-section method in 32 thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies from six cadaveric specimens. Both 5-mm and 10-mm contiguous section sequences afforded greater sample volumes, mean mineral equivalent values, and precision than did the single midplane section technique. These findings can be explained by inhomogeneous trabecular distribution, differential bone resorption rates for various cancellous regions, and nonuniform deposition of marrow fat. Scoliosis may modify the net influence of these factors owing to altered biomechanical forces. Although the single-section method affords optimal sensitivity to early or subtle alterations in vertebral trabecular bone density, it may misrepresent the status of the total cancellous volume. Because three-dimensional histographic analysis includes structurally important peripheral trabeculae in determinations of mean mineral equivalent values, it may more accurately reflect vertebral body strength and risk of compression fracture.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
