Abstract
Background Qi-replenishing Chinese medicines (QCMs) are used for treating prediabetes in the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical practice. The aims of this meta-analysis were to (i) verify the efficacy and safety of QCMs in treating prediabetes and (ii) investigate the clinical outcomes between the trials complying with and not complying with the principle of “syndrome differentiation.” Methods We included only randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) whose Jadad scores were not less than 4. The overall clinical outcomes, including the incidence rate of diabetes, normalization of blood glucose, changes in fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2 h postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c, and occurrence of adverse events, were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Results A total of 11 RCTs that enrolled 2210 patients with prediabetes were included. We observed that overall treatment with QCMs significantly ameliorated the clinical outcomes of prediabetes without increasing incidence of adverse events. The results of subgroup analyses revealed that prescribing QCMs complying with syndrome differentiation ameliorated all the clinical indices, whereas prescribing not complying with syndrome differentiation could not achieve significant amelioration in FBG and HbA1c levels. Furthermore, the subgroup with syndrome differentiation reported more adverse events. Conclusions The overall results suggested that QCMs are effective and safe in treating prediabetes. Results of subgroup analyses indicated that the groups with syndrome differentiation presented better efficacy but had a higher occurrence of adverse events. This study indicated the important role of the principle of syndrome differentiation in TCM and that the adverse events of QCMs cannot be ignored in TCM clinical practice.
Highlights
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global public health concern with a high prevalence rate
In the sensitivity analysis of fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2 h postprandial blood glucose (2hPG), and HbA1C levels, we found that three trials not complying with syndrome differentiation [17, 20, 23] were the primary sources of high heterogeneity, which may be associated with different selection of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) herbs and small sample size
Our overall results showed that Qi-replenishing Chinese medicines (QCMs) significantly improved the incidence rate and normalized the levels of blood glucose (BG), FBG, 2hPG, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with prediabetes, but they did not improve the occurrence of adverse events. e efficacy and safety of QCMs were verified
Summary
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global public health concern with a high prevalence rate. Studies have documented that early interventions in prediabetes can prevent or delay the progression of T2D and the development of complications [3, 4] In this regard, conventional interventions include lifestyle modification (LM) or/and antidiabetic medicine. In China, herbs based on the theories of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) are commonly used for treating patients with prediabetes to prevent its progression to T2D. E overall clinical outcomes, including the incidence rate of diabetes, normalization of blood glucose, changes in fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2 h postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c, and occurrence of adverse events, were evaluated. E results of subgroup analyses revealed that prescribing QCMs complying with syndrome differentiation ameliorated all the clinical indices, whereas prescribing not complying with syndrome differentiation could not achieve significant amelioration in FBG and HbA1c levels.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.