Abstract

ObjectivesNeurocognitive functions contribute to speech recognition in postlingual adults with cochlear implants (CIs). In particular, better verbal working memory (WM) on modality‐specific (auditory) WM tasks predicts better speech recognition. It remains unclear, however, whether this association can be attributed to basic underlying modality‐general neurocognitive functions, or whether it is solely a result of the degraded nature of auditory signals delivered by the CI. Three hypotheses were tested: 1) Both modality‐specific and modality‐general tasks of verbal WM would predict scores of sentence recognition in speech‐shaped noise; 2) Basic modality‐general neurocognitive functions of controlled fluency and inhibition‐concentration would predict both modality‐specific and modality‐general verbal WM; and 3) Scores on both tasks of verbal WM would mediate the effects of more basic neurocognitive functions on sentence recognition.Study DesignCross‐sectional study of 30 postlingual adults with CIs and thirty age‐matched normal‐hearing (NH) controls.Materials and MethodsParticipants were tested for sentence recognition in speech‐shaped noise, along with verbal WM using a modality‐general task (Reading Span) and an auditory modality‐specific task (Listening Span). Participants were also assessed for controlled fluency and inhibition‐concentration abilities.ResultsFor CI users only, Listening Span scores predicted sentence recognition, and Listening Span scores mediated the effects of inhibition‐concentration on speech recognition. Scores on Reading Span were not related to sentence recognition for either group.ConclusionInhibition‐concentration skills play an important role in CI users' sentence recognition skills, with effects mediated by modality‐specific verbal WM. Further studies will examine inhibition‐concentration and WM skills as novel targets for clinical intervention.Level of Evidence4.

Highlights

  • Speech recognition outcomes among adults with acquired sensorineural hearing loss who receive cochlear implants (CIs) are not solely a result of factors relating to the device and the condition of the peripheral auditory system (i.e., “bottom-up factors”)

  • For CI users only, Listening Span scores predicted sentence recognition, and Listening Span scores mediated the effects of inhibition-concentration on speech recognition

  • Inhibition-concentration skills play an important role in CI users’ sentence recognition skills, with effects mediated by modality-specific verbal working memory (WM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Speech recognition outcomes among adults with acquired sensorineural hearing loss who receive cochlear implants (CIs) are not solely a result of factors relating to the device and the condition of the peripheral auditory system (i.e., “bottom-up factors”).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.