Abstract
Conceptualization of retirement requires interdisciplinary research, which is represented by psycholinguistic approach in the present paper. The study takes a first step to explore conceptualization of retirement by individuals with different levels of retirement preparedness. The study applies questionnaire Psychological Preparedness for Retirement (Zasiekina & Mahdysiuk, 2018) to assess levels of preparedness; semi-structured interviews to focus primarily on concerns related to planning postretirement period; Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) (Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010) to reveal psychological categories and explore conceptualization of retirement. By the end of the assessment, data had been collected from 117 workers who were at preretirement period. The sample was weighted by age and occupation in order to improve its representative of the total population 22 (18.8%) – university staff, teachers at colleges, 18 (15.4%), nurses in kindergartens, 8 (6.6%), healthcare staff, 18 (15.4%), government officials, 28 (23.9%), workers from private sector, 23 (19.7%). The final weighted sample includes 65.8% females, average age 54.52, (SD=6.21). The results indicate that 8.5% respondents have a low level of preparedness, 61.5% - a medium level of preparedness and 30% - a high level of preparedness. Interestingly, the highest percentage of categories of affect and positive emotions were observed in the group with a medium level of preparedness, whereas the highest percentage of categories cause, focus on present, and family were captured in the group with a high level of preparedness. Taken together, these results suggest that the high level of retirement preparedness is associated with active cognitive reappraisal of retirement as a period of family activities.
Highlights
There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of retirement preparedness since retirees have a number of psychological issues, notably loss of identity aligned with professional life (Osborne, 2012). Osborne (2012) argues that the main negative effects of preretirement period includes difficulties in decision making, decreased self-esteem and self-confidence, loss of meaning in identity, and death-anxiety
The highest percentage of categories of affect and positive emotions were observed in the group with a medium level of preparedness, whereas the highest percentage of categories cause, focus on present, and family were captured in the group with a high level of preparedness
These results suggest that the high level of retirement preparedness is associated with active cognitive reappraisal of retirement as a period of family activities
Summary
There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of retirement preparedness since retirees have a number of psychological issues, notably loss of identity aligned with professional life (Osborne, 2012). Osborne (2012) argues that the main negative effects of preretirement period includes difficulties in decision making, decreased self-esteem and self-confidence, loss of meaning in identity, and death-anxiety. There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of retirement preparedness since retirees have a number of psychological issues, notably loss of identity aligned with professional life (Osborne, 2012). Osborne (2012) argues that the main negative effects of preretirement period includes difficulties in decision making, decreased self-esteem and self-confidence, loss of meaning in identity, and death-anxiety. In contrast to loss of identity in retirees, there is much less information about constructing meaning of retirement by individuals with different levels of retirement preparedness This indicates a need to EVasetrbEaulroEpxeparnesJsoiounrnoafl PofrePpsayrcehdonleisnsgiunisRtiectsi.reVmoelunmt Pela7n, nNinugmIbnetrer2v,i2e0w2s0 understand the various meanings of retirement that exist among individuals in preretirement period. This study provides an important opportunity to advance the understanding of the main negative psychological issues aligned with retirement, and suggests psychological support for individuals in preretirement period. The present article takes a first step to explore constructing meaning of retirement in individuals with different levels of retirement preparedness and examines the main difficulties in preretirement period, expressed verbally in retirement planning interviews
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
