Abstract

We studied the role of central command mediation of exercise hyperpnea by comparing the ventilatory and arterial CO2 partial pressure (PaCO2) responses to voluntary (ExV) and electrically induced (ExE) muscle contractions in normal, awake human subjects. We hypothesized that if central command signals are critical to a normal ventilatory response, then ExE should cause a slower ventilatory response resulting in hypercapnia at the onset of exercise. ExE was induced through surface electrodes placed over the quadriceps and hamstring muscles. ExE and ExV produced leg extension (40/min) against a spring load that increased CO2 production (VCO2) 100-1,000 ml/min above resting level. PaCO2 and arterial pH during work transitions and in the steady state did not differ significantly from rest (P greater than 0.05) or between ExE and ExV. The temporal pattern of ventilation, tidal volume, breathing frequency, and inspired and expired times, and the ventilation-VCO2 relationship were similar between ExE and ExV. We conclude that since central command was reduced and/or eliminated by ExE, central command is not requisite for the precise matching of alveolar ventilation to increases in VCO2 during low-intensity muscle contractions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.