Abstract

Venetoclax plus 3+7 daunorubicin and cytarabine chemotherapy (DAV) has shown safety and efficacy in eligible patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, there are no direct comparisons between DAV and 3+7 daunorubicin and cytarabine chemotherapy (DA) alone. We performed a propensity score-matched analysis to compare the outcomes of DAV group with historical DA group and identify the clinical and molecular characteristics of patients who might benefit from the DAV regimen. The DAV group had a higher Complete remission (CR) rate than the DA group (90% vs. 55%, p=0.008). 25 (96%) patients in the DAV group had a higher MRD-negative CRc rate compared with 13 (62%) patients in the DA group (p=0.006). After a median follow-up duration of 19.15 (IQR 17.13-21.67) months, the DAV group had an improved overall survival (p=0.001) and event-free survival (p=0.069), but not disease-free survival (p=0.136). Collectively, DAV regimen induced high CR rates and deep MRD-negative CRc rates after one cycle of induction therapy, as well as prolonged the overall survival, in young adult patients with AML who were eligible for intensive chemotherapy. The addition of venetoclax to intensive chemotherapy should be considered in the future to achieve better survival advantages in eligible AML patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call