Abstract

Current investigations into urban aerial mobility, as well as the continuing growth of global air transportation, have renewed interest in conflict detection and resolution (CD&R) methods. The use of drones for applications such as package delivery, would result in traffic densities that are orders of magnitude higher than those currently observed in manned aviation. Such densities do not only make automated conflict detection and resolution a necessity, but will also force a re-evaluation of aspects such as coordination vs. priority, or state vs. intent. This paper looks into enabling a safe introduction of drones into urban airspace by setting travelling rules in the operating airspace which benefit tactical conflict resolution. First, conflicts resulting from changes of direction are added to conflict resolution with intent trajectory propagation. Second, the likelihood of aircraft with opposing headings meeting in conflict is reduced by separating traffic into different layers per heading–altitude rules. Guidelines are set in place to make sure aircraft respect the heading ranges allowed at every crossed layer. Finally, we use a reinforcement learning agent to implement variable speed limits towards creating a more homogeneous traffic situation between cruising and climbing/descending aircraft. The effects of all of these variables were tested through fast-time simulations on an open source airspace simulation platform. Results showed that we were able to improve the operational safety of several scenarios.

Highlights

  • The final best scenario expected is when all the structural rules are applied to the environment: (1) heading–altitude rules are used to divide aircraft into multiple layers; (2) variable speed limits are in place to improve speed homogeneity between cruising and climbing/descending aircraft; and (3) intent trajectory propagation is added to conflict resolution, allowing the Conflict resolution (CR) model to prepare for all possible future cases

  • In order to properly analyse the effect of the multiple independent variables on the dependent measures, several baseline situations are presented alongside this scenario: (a) a one-layer scenario; (b) a multi-layer situation without variable speed limits; and (c) a multi-layer situation with only a 90% compliance rate to the variable speed limits

  • There are questions regarding their implementation: (1) the benefit of adding intent information is lost as traffic density increases, and its usage should be weighted against the expected densities and cost of implementation; (2) variable speed limits (VSL) implementation resulted in the same maximum speed value being employed in the majority of times, which raises questions regarding the ability of the method to adapt and personalise maximum speed values

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Safety automation within unmanned aviation is a priority, as drones must be capable of conflict detection and resolution (CD&R) without human intervention. Both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) have ruled that an UAS must have “sense and avoid” capability in order to be allowed in the civil airspace [4,5]. Over the past three decades, conflict detection and resolution methods have already been widely explored for manned aviation. The most consequential difference with conventional aviation is the presence of constraints in an urban environment, such as obstacles and hyperlocal weather, which will bring additional considerations in the design of conflict detection and resolution logic

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call