Abstract

This chapter introduces the reader to a variety of authoritarian discourses and practices in Central Asia since the collapse of the Soviet Union. With the partial exception of Kyrgyzstan, the Central Asian states have coalesced around an authoritarian model in which electoral processes are undemocratic and play only a limited role in determining policies and personnel. However, this chapter argues that this model masks a variance between the regimes in the region in how they use legitimising discourses, practices of security and surveillance of physical space, and their management and dominance of key business sectors. Despite the different approaches by each regime, the authoritarian model, with the exception of Kyrgyzstan, has proved resilient in Central Asia, ensuring its longevity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.