Abstract

In recent works, beginning with [76], several stochastic geophysical fluid dynamics (SGFD) models have been derived from variational principles. In this paper, we introduce a new framework for parametrization schemes (PS) in GFD. We derive a class of rough geophysical fluid dynamics (RGFD) models as critical points of rough action functionals using the theory of controlled rough paths. These RGFD models characterize Lagrangian trajectories in fluid dynamics as geometric rough paths (GRP) on the manifold of diffeomorphic maps. We formulate three constrained variational approaches for the derivation of these models. The first is the Clebsch formulation, in which the constraints are imposed as rough advection laws. The second is the Hamilton-Pontryagin formulation, in which the constraints are imposed as right-invariant rough vector fields. And the third is the Euler–Poincaré formulation, in which the variations are constrained. These constrained rough variational principles lead directly to the Lie–Poisson Hamiltonian formulation of fluid dynamics on GRP. The GRP framework preserves the geometric structure of fluid dynamics obtained by using Lie group reduction to pass from Lagrangian to Eulerian variational principles, yielding a rough formulation of the Kelvin circulation theorem. The rough formulation enhances its stochastic counterpart developed in [76], and extended to semimartingales in [109]. For example, the rough-path variational approach includes non-Markovian perturbations of the Lagrangian fluid trajectories. In particular, memory effects can be introduced through a judicious choice of the rough path (e.g. a realization of a fractional Brownian motion). In the particular case when the rough path is a realization of a semimartingale, we recover the SGFD models in [76,109]. However, by eliminating the need for stochastic variational tools, we retain a pathwise interpretation of the Lagrangian trajectories. In contrast, the Lagrangian trajectories in the stochastic framework are described by stochastic integrals, which do not have a pathwise interpretation. Thus, the rough path formulation restores this property.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call