Abstract
Flexible resource investment is a risk sensitive reproductive strategy where individuals trade resources spent on reproduction for basic metabolic maintenance and survival. This study examined morphological variation in herbivorous sea urchin grazers across a mosaic landscape of macroalgae dominated habitats interspersed with patches of sea urchin barrens to determine whether sea urchins shift energy allocation in response to food limitation. Extensive underwater surveys of habitat attributes (e.g., sea urchin density, algae cover) were paired with detailed laboratory assays (e.g., sea urchin dissections) to determine how resource abundance affects energy allocation between reproductive capacity and body structure in the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. We found that: (1) sea urchins had a more elongate jaw structure relative to body size in habitats void of macroalgae (i.e., barrens), (2) sea urchin reproductive capacity (i.e., gonad index) was lower in barrens and the barrens habitat was primarily comprised of encrusting algae, and (3) sea urchin jaw morphology (i.e., lantern index) and reproductive capacity (i.e., gonad index) were inversely related. These results suggest that sea urchins respond to macroalgae limited environments by shifting energy allocation between reproductive capacity and modifications of the foraging apparatus, which may explain the ability of sea urchins to acquire food in resource-limited environments.
Highlights
A central issue in life history theory is whether organisms can be flexible in how they invest resources (Bradshaw, 1965; Bårdsen et al, 2011)
An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that relative lantern length was significantly greater in sea urchin barrens than in kelp forest habitats (F = 72.63, DF = 2 and 80, P < 0.0001)
This study examined variation in sea urchin morphological traits across a patchy mosaic landscape of kelp forests interspersed with
Summary
A central issue in life history theory is whether (and how) organisms can be flexible in how they invest resources (Bradshaw, 1965; Bårdsen et al, 2011). When faced with food limitations, many organisms will reallocate internal resources, shifting from reproduction and energy storage to basic metabolic maintenance (Braby & Jones, 1995; Fiore & Rodman, 2001; Bauerfeind & Fischer, 2005). This is especially true in dynamic environments where organisms are susceptible to rapid (or even seasonal) changes in resources, or experience periods of extreme climatic events (Boggs & Ross, 1993; Lau et al, 2009).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.