Variation in nutritional quality of an invasive seagrass does not explain its low palatability to two key herbivores in a Caribbean Bay

Abstract

The seagrass Halophila stipulacea continues to spread rapidly through the Caribbean. Documenting native herbivore use of this invasive plant is important for understanding its impacts on marine communities and the mechanisms favoring its expansion. This study used observational and experimental data to determine if juvenile green turtles (Chelonia mydas) and long-spine urchins (Diadema antillarum) from the US Virgin Islands consumed H. stipulacea in the presence of native seagrass. Juvenile turtles associated significantly more with beds of native seagrass than mixed (native and invasive), and monospecific H. stipulacea, beds or sand bottoms. When individuals were followed, turtles foraged significantly more within mixed beds, but selectively fed on native species within them and were never observed feeding on monospecific H. stipulacea stands. When offered the native Thalassia testudinum and Syringodium filiforme, along with H. stipulacea, sea urchins significantly preferred S. filiforme over the other two choices. Measurements of fourteen nutritional and chemical parameters in these three seagrasses showed strong interspecific differences, with fewer and less predictable seasonal variations. Expressing these nutritional data by wet mass, rather than dry mass, also decreased the number of significant seasonal contrasts. Despite these differences, no parameters explained low herbivore preference for the invasive seagrass satisfactorily because nutrient values of H. stipulacea were often similar to those of the preferred natives. Our results conflict with recent studies pointing at low nutritional quality aiding against herbivory and suggest other mechanisms, such as herbivore learning and recognition of a novel resource, could be more important than currently appreciated.