Abstract

Based on mortality estimates for 32 causes of death that are amenable to health care, the US health care system did not perform as well as other high-income countries, scoring 88.7 out of 100 on the 2016 age-standardized Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) index. To compare US age-specific HAQ scores with those of high-income countries with universal health insurance coverage and compare scores among US states with varying insurance coverage. This cross-sectional study used 2016 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factor study results for cause-specific mortality with adjustments for behavioral and environmental risks to estimate the age-specific HAQ indices. The US national age-specific HAQ scores were compared with high-income peers (Canada, western Europe, high-income Asia Pacific countries, and Australasia) in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2016, and the 2016 scores among US states were also analyzed. The Public Use Microdata Sample of the American Community Survey was used to estimate insurance coverage and the median income per person by age and state. Age-specific HAQ scores for each state in 2010 and 2016 were regressed based on models with age fixed effects and age interaction with insurance coverage, median income, and year. Data were analyzed from April to July 2018 and July to September 2020. The age-specific HAQ indices were the outcome measures. In 1990, US age-specific HAQ scores were similar to peers but increased less from 1990 to 2016 than peer locations for ages 15 years or older. For example, for ages 50 to 54 years, US scores increased from 77.1 to 82.1 while high-income Asia Pacific scores increased from 71.6 to 88.2. In 2016, several states had scores comparable with peers, with large differences in performance across states. For ages 15 years or older, the age-specific HAQ scores were 85 or greater for all ages in 3 states (Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Minnesota) and 75 or less for at least 1 age category in 6 states. In regression analysis estimates with state-fixed effects, insurance coverage coefficients for ages 20 to 24 years were 0.059 (99% CI, 0.006-0.111); 45 to 49 years, 0.088 (99% CI, 0.009-0.167); and 50 to 54 years, 0.101 (99% CI, 0.013-0.189). A 10% increase in insurance coverage was associated with point increases in HAQ scores among the ages of 20 to 24 years (0.59 [99% CI, 0.06-1.11]), 45 to 49 years (0.88 [99% CI, 0.09-1.67]), and 50 to 54 years (1.01 [99% CI, 0.13-1.89]). In this cross-sectional study, the US age-specific HAQ scores for ages 15 to 64 years were low relative to high-income peer locations with universal health insurance coverage. Among US states, insurance coverage was associated with higher HAQ scores for some ages. Further research with causal models and additional explanations is warranted.

Highlights

  • Despite the contributions of the US to biology and medical science,[1,2] the US health care system does not perform as well as most high-income countries according to various measures.[3,4,5,6] The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) index, created by Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) collaborators, is based on amenable mortality, defined as deaths that should not occur in the presence of timely and effective care.[3]

  • A 10% increase in insurance coverage was associated with point increases in HAQ scores among the ages of 20 to 24 years (0.59 [99% CI, 0.06-1.11]), 45 to years (0.88 [99% CI, 0.09-1.67]), and to 54 years (1.01 [99% CI, 0.13-1.89])

  • Among US states, insurance coverage was associated with higher HAQ scores for some ages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the contributions of the US to biology and medical science,[1,2] the US health care system does not perform as well as most high-income countries according to various measures.[3,4,5,6] The Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) index, created by Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) collaborators, is based on amenable mortality, defined as deaths that should not occur in the presence of timely and effective care.[3]. When comparing populations across states, the 2016 age-standardized HAQ scores ranged from a high in Minnesota of 92.3 (95% UI, 90.6-93.6) to a low in Mississippi of 81.5 (95% UI, 78.6-84.2).[6] Health insurance coverage varies by age and state because state governments can expand benefits and eligibility for programs above the minimum federal requirements,[7,8,9,10] with the exception of federally provided Medicare for individual aged 65 or older or individuals who are disabled and eligible for Social Security benefits or have end-stage kidney disease. Our objective was to compare US age-specific HAQ scores with those of high-income countries with universal health insurance coverage and compare scores among US states with varying insurance coverage

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call