Abstract

Despite diagnosis being an important part of clinical or medical consultations, the diagnosis might fail leading to adverse effects. This is a global problem, where developed and developing countries go through. In sub-Saharan Africa, variations between initial diagnosis and final diagnosis lead to diagnostic errors with high maternal mortalities. In Kenya, a lot of measures have been put in place but still, variation in diagnosis appear to have become rampant. Bungoma county is one of the counties with a high mortality ratio, especially for pregnant women attributed to the variation between initial and final diagnosis. Therefore, it was crucial to investigate the variation between initial and final diagnosis in relation to obstetric outcomes at hospitals in Bungoma County. The cross-sectional research design was used (Bungoma and Webuye hospitals). Systematic sampling was used to obtain 384 respondents after proportionate allocation to each hospital, and purposive sampling to select 8 health care workers as key informants. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire and an interview guide. The pre-test was done with validity established through crosschecking and reliability calculated using the Cronbach method (0.89). Using a statistical package for social sciences version 25, descriptive and inferential statistics was run where chi-square and odds ratio was used to determine the influence between variables, significance and prediction. The study revealed a variation between initial diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 20.8% while diagnostic errors were significant predictors of obstetric outcomes among post-natal mothers at level five with a p-value of 0.045 at a significance of 5%(P=0.045). Demographic characteristics showed no relationship with obstetric outcomes (P=0.54>0.05). Matched diagnostic had no variations (N=327, M=1.00, SD=0.000); while unmatched diagnostic had variations (N=327, M=1.82, SD=.384). There was a relationship between diagnostic errors and obstetric outcome (ꭓ2 (1) = 251.86, p< .001). An association between diagnostic error with unsafe obstetric outcomes was significant at the odds ratio of 2.03(OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.31–2.16). The study demonstrates that a correct diagnosis is a viable strategy in preventing unsafe obstetric outcomes and by extension minimizing morbidity and mortality among pregnant women. The study concluded that there was a variation between initial diagnosis and final diagnosis which had an adverse obstetric outcome. it was recommended to build capacities for the health workers in order to address increased diagnostic errors.

Highlights

  • Despite an impressive evolution in diagnostic technology, the disparity between clinical diagnosis and autopsy is not declining [1]

  • Still, maternal mortality was 382 deaths per 100,000 live births. What made it a continuous problem in health facilities in Bungoma County? It was determined that most facilities were ill-equipped to effectively diagnose from the first time of consultation where the initial diagnosis was essential in planning for the course of action

  • The results from the study showed that initial diagnosis and final diagnosis had a standard deviation of 0.387 whereas with this variation when projected to pregnancy outcomes there were 20.4 % unsafe pregnancy outcomes resulting from these diagnostic errors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite an impressive evolution in diagnostic technology, the disparity between clinical diagnosis and autopsy is not declining [1]. Diagnosis is meant to provide a reliable clinical condition of the client [2]. The deviation of the final diagnosis from the initial diagnosis which is an unmatched diagnosis lead to variations [2]-0 The right diagnosis has a positive health outcome in most cases. Health care facilities lack the tools and strategies for measuring diagnostic safety and most have not integrated diagnostic error into their existing patient safety programs [4]. Unsafe health care has been recognized as a global challenge and much has been done to understand the causes, consequences and potential solutions to this problem [6]. Variations in diagnostic errors arise from both

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.