Abstract
Analysis parameters and various distance measures are investigated for a template matching scheme for speaker identity verification (SIV). Two parameters are systematically varied-the length of the signal analysis window, and the order of the linear predictive coding/-cepstrum analysis. Computational costs associated with the choice of parameters are also considered. The distance measures tested are the Euclidean, inverse variance weighting, differential mean weighting, Kahn's simplified weighting, the Mahalanobis distance, and the Fisher linear discriminant. Using the equal error rate (EER) of pairwise utterance dissimilarity distributions, performance is estimated for prespecified and (a simulation of) user-determined input vocabulary. Performance varies significantly across vocabulary, and average performance is approximately 5% EER for the better algorithms on telephone speech. >
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
