Abstract

The vapor pressures of YbCl3, YbBr3, YbI2, LuCl3, LuBr3, and LuI3 were measured by torsion and Knudsen effusion methods. Their temperature dependences may be reported as follows: YbCl3(s): log(p/kPa) = (11.30 ± 0.20) − (14420 ± 200)/(T/K) from (944 to 1096) K; YbBr3(s): log(p/kPa) = (11.51 ± 0.20) − (14070 ± 300)/(T/K) from (891 to 1032) K; YbI2(s): log(p/kPa) = (9.37 ± 0.30) − (13580 ± 300)/(T/K) from (968 to 1049) K; YbI2(l): log(p/kPa) = (9.04 ± 0.25) − (13220 ± 300)/(T/K) from (1068 to 1192) K; LuCl3(s): log(p/kPa) = (11.68 ± 0.15) − (14940 ± 150)/(T/K) from (942 to 1075) K; LuBr3(s): log(p/kPa) = (11.34 ± 0.20) − (14040 ± 300)/(T/K) from (903 to 1038) K; LuI3(s): log(p/kPa) = (11.99 ± 0.40) − (14270 ± 300)/(T/K) from (862 to 1004) K. Treating the vapor pressures of YbCl3 and LuCl3 by second- and third-law, the following standard sublimation enthalpies, ΔsubH°(298 K) = (288 ± 6) and (295 ± 5) kJ·mol-1, respectively, were derived. Comparison of these enthalpies with those of other rare earth trichlorides, recalculated by using a new set of thermodynamic functions, was made. From the YbBr3, LuBr3, and LuI3 vapor pressures, the second-law sublimation enthalpies, extrapolated at 298 K by estimated enthalpic increments, ΔsubH°(298 K) = (285 ± 9), (285 ± 9), and (288 ± 9) kJ·mol-1, respectively, were evaluated. For YbI2, ΔsubH°(298 K) = (302 ± 6) kJ·mol-1 was obtained by use of thermal functions estimated by analogy with the published data on EuI2.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.