Abstract
Combining COSMO-based excess Gibbs free energy models with the Peng-Robinson (PR) equation-of-state (EoS) via mixing rules has recently been shown as a promising method for satisfied VLE predictions on refrigerant systems by Mambo-Lomba and Paricaud. An extension is provided in this work for more systematic and dedicated evaluations focusing on a significantly larger refrigerant database and comparisons between different VLE modeling approaches. In particular, the COSMO-SAC-dsp model is combined with via the original Huron-Vidal (HVO), the modified Huron-Vidal (MHV1) and the Wong-Sandler (WS) mixing rules. Comprehensive model evaluation is performed on the basis of 447 vapor-liquid-equilibrium (VLE) experimental datasets for 233 refrigerant pairs. The results show that the combination of the COSMO-SAC-dsp with the PR yields satisfied and comparable prediction accuracy on the VLE in most cases comparing to the well-established group-contribution based Gex-EoS methods VTPR and PSRK. The performance of the three mixing rules on the studied database follows a decreasing order of MHV1 > HVO > WS but without qualitative difference. Large VLE prediction errors can appear between halogenated hydrocarbons and hydrocarbons. Moreover, errors become more significant and the VLE calculation cannot converge at all for mixtures involving R717 and R744 respectively. Improved predictive accuracy can be achieved by re-optimizing the atomic dispersion parameters of F and =O to 35.5 and 74.0 respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.