Abstract
We outline a parsimonious empirical model to assess the relative usefulness of accounting and equity market based information to explain corporate credit spreads. The primary determinant of corporate credit spreads is the physical default probability. We compare existing accounting-based and market-based models to forecast default, and find that a modified structural model with accounting and market inputs is best able to forecast default and explain cross-sectional variation in credit spreads. We then assess whether the credit market completely incorporates this default information into credit spreads. Interestingly, we find that credit spreads reflect information about forecasted default rates with a significant lag. This evidence is suggestive of a role for value investing in credit markets.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
