Abstract

BackgroundClinical success of total ankle arthroplasty depends heavily on the available information on the morphology of the bones, often obtained from measurements on planar radiographs. The current study aimed to evaluate the intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-session reliability and the validity of radiograph-based measurements of ankle morphology, and to quantify the effects of examiner experience on these measurements.MethodsTwenty-four fresh frozen ankle specimens were CT scanned, data of which were used to reconstruct 3D volumetric bone models for synthesizing 2D radiographs. Two orthopaedic surgeons with different levels of clinical experience identified twenty landmarks five times on each of the synthesized sagittal and coronal radiographs and repeated the test on a subsequent day within 5 days. The landmarks were used to calculate fourteen morphological parameters. The two-way mixed-effects (ICC3,1), two-way random-effects (ICC2,k) and two-way random-effects (ICC3,k) models were used, respectively, to assess the intra-rater, inter-rater and inter-session reliability of measurements. The validity of the measurements for each examiner was assessed by comparing them with gold standard values obtained from the 2D radiographs projected from the 3D volumetric models using Pearson’s correlation analysis and Bland and Altman plots, and the differences were defined as the measurement errors.ResultsMost of the morphological parameters were of good to very good intra-rater, inter-session and inter-rater reliability for both examiners (ICC > 0.61). Experience appeared to affect the inter-rater and inter-session reliability, the senior examiner showing greater inter-session ICC values than the junior examiner. Most of the tibial parameters had moderate to excellent correlations with the corresponding gold standard values but were underestimated by both examiners, in contrast to most of the talar parameters that were overestimated and had only poor to fair correlations.ConclusionsMost of the morphological parameters of the ankle can be estimated from radiographs with good to very good intra-rater, inter-session and inter-rater reliability, for both clinically experienced and less experienced examiners. Clinical experience helped increase the reliability of repeated evaluations after a longer interval, such as in a follow-up assessment. It is suggested that critical clinical decisions based on repeated morphology measurements should be made by more experienced surgeons or after appropriate training.

Highlights

  • Clinical success of total ankle arthroplasty depends heavily on the avail‐ able information on the morphology of the bones, often obtained from measurements on planar radiographs

  • Good to very good intra-rater reliability was found in most of these parameters for both examiners, except for moderate reliability found for SRTa by both examiners and sagittal radius of the tibial mortise (SRTi) by the junior examiner, and for poor reliability for most proximal vertices of the trochlea tali (MLATa) by both examiners (Table 3)

  • In terms of inter-rater analysis, good to very good reliability was found for all the parameters, except for poor reliability (ICC = 0.20) for MLATa (Table 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinical success of total ankle arthroplasty depends heavily on the avail‐ able information on the morphology of the bones, often obtained from measurements on planar radiographs. Ankle arthrodesis is effective for pain relief and in restoring joint stability, but sacrifices joint mobility, which can seriously affect locomotion [6,7,8]. Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an important alternative to arthrodesis [4, 9,10,11], especially for the management of advanced ankle osteoarthritis (OA), because it relieves pain and restores joint stability, but it restores mobility of the joint [12]. Clinical success of TAA depends heavily on the available information on the morphology of the relevant bones [15], which is critical for the design of ankle prostheses and for the procedures of their surgical implantation [1, 2]. Current advancements in manufacturing will lead to personalized solutions for human joint replacements [16], which necessarily must be based on accurate morphological measurements of the individual patients [17, 18]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call