Abstract

Aim. To validate the SIRENA score in assessing the risk of inhospital mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) in an independent sample.Material and methods. This retrospective, single-center study was based on the Samara Regional Cardiology Center. The risk of inhospital mortality was assessed using the SIRENA score, which includes such parameters as left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, immobilization in prior 12 months, creatinine clearance <50 ml/min, syncope, cyanosis on admission. For each positive sign, 1 point is assigned. Low risk is set at score of 0-1, high — ≥2.Results. The study included 452 patients with PE hospitalized from 2004 to 2019, of which 221 (48,9%) were men (mean age, 60,0 years (50,5-70,0)). With SIRENA score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, inhospital mortality was 4,1%, 10,8%, 18,8%, 40,0%, and 100%, respectively. Mortality at SIRENA low risk (<2) was 7,1%, and at high risk (≥2) — 20,5% (odds ratio (OR), 3,34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1,74-6,43; p<0,001). The predictive sensitivity and specificity for inhospital mortality for the SIRENA score were 70,5% and 60,8%, respectively. Area under the ROC-curve for the SIRENA score was 0,71 (95% CI, 0,63-0,79), while for Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) — 0,69 (95% CI, 0,60-0,77). With high risk on both scales (sPESI and SIRENA), inhospital mortality was 24,2% (OR, 4,09, 95% CI, 2,07-8,09; p<0,001).Conclusion. On an independent sample, the SIRENA score showed a high predictive ability in predicting adverse outcomes in patients with PE with a sensitivity of 70,5% and a specificity of 60,8% (AUC=0,71, 95% CI, 0,63-0,79), comparable with the sPESI.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call