Abstract
When we (Hippa, Mattsson and Vilkamaa 2005a) proposed the genus name Blagorrhina gen. n., with two new species, we missed to include the type species designation for the genus. The subsequent correction (Hippa, Mattsson and Vilkamaa 2005b), in which we did not indicate the name to be ‘new’, failed to make the generic name available according to ICZN Article 16.1, and it remained a nomen nudum (Evenhuis et al. 2008).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
