Abstract

No disponible

Highlights

  • Klinger (2000: 275) made use of the unavailable name Otolelus Mroczkowski and designated a type species for it: Xylophilus pruinosus Kiesenwetter, 1861. This action is contrary to the Code, since an unavailable name cannot have a type species by subsequent designation, only available names described before 1931 can have it

  • Article 67.8 only allows the designation of a type species for a genus published before 1931 without it, through a new replacement name in the same work where the replacement name is being proposed

  • Since there is no information about the relative precedence of both descriptions of Olotelus Mulsant & Rey (1866a or 1866b), and to avoid possible future complications, I designate here as well X. neglectus Jacquelin du Val, 1863 as the type species of Olotelus Mulsant & Rey, 1866b

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Klinger (2000: 275) made use of the unavailable name Otolelus Mroczkowski and designated a type species for it: Xylophilus pruinosus Kiesenwetter, 1861. This action is contrary to the Code, since an unavailable name cannot have a type species by subsequent designation, only available names described before 1931 can have it. Article 67.8 only allows the designation of a type species for a genus published before 1931 without it, through a new replacement name in the same work where the replacement name is being proposed.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.