Abstract

Of late, we have put forward a new branch called high-order derivative signal processing. This investigative strategy is universally relevant for all spectroscopies, the progress of which ultimately depends on resolution improvement and noise suppression. The high-order, non-parametric derivative fast Padé transform (dFPT) simultaneously solves these two problems of utmost importance. The present work goes one critical step further than our previous two studies on this particular topic, by setting up the goal of validating the non-parametric dFPT by its parametric counterpart. This is done by comparing the full lineshapes of derivative envelopes from the non-parametric dFPT with the corresponding derivative component spectra from the parametric dFPT. The non-parametric dFPT, as a shape estimator, never solves the quantification problem (or equivalently, the spectral analysis problem via e.g. an eigenvalue problem, rooting characteristic/secular equations, etc.). The parametric dFPT first solves the quantification problem from which the lineshapes of components and envelopes are plotted. Thus, if the derivative component spectra from the parametric dFPT could be fully reconstructed by the derivative envelopes from the non-parametric dFPT, the goal of achieving quantification would be done by derivative lineshape processing alone. This would amount to providing stand-alone quantification without actually solving the quantification problem (and, of course, without fitting, either). The present study accomplishes this goal, with an important application to data encountered in magnetic resonance spectroscopy for clinical diagnostics of breast cancer.

Highlights

  • We pursue a novel pathway in analyzing spectra by non-parametric high-order derivative signal processing

  • This is a general methodology for all spectroscopies, including those based on magnetic resonance (MR), which is the focus of the present work within the non-parametric derivative fast Padé transform

  • From the viewpoint of signal processing alone, the time signals encoded by ion-cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ICRMS) [11,12,13] or time of flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS) [14], or infrared spectroscopy (IRS) [7, 8] are all amenable to exactly the same type of estimation done presently within magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), which outside medicine is called nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy [15, 16]

Read more

Summary

B Dževad Belkic

J Math Chem (2018) 56:2537–2578 cation without solving the quantification problem (and, without fitting, either). Keywords Magnetic resonance spectroscopy · Breast cancer diagnostics · Mathematical optimization · Fast Padé transform · Derivative spectra

Introduction
Theory
The input spectrum
The output spectra
Physical interpretation of the output linelist of peak parameters
Stopping criteria for completing the computation of the derivative envelopes
Peak parameters for the non-parametric dFPT
Results
Input data
Output data
Processing by the dFPT with comparisons to the dFFT
Non-parametric dFPT versus parametric dFPT
Red: Components
Clinical relevant of derivative magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Discussion and conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.