Abstract

Monitoring large bodies of water, such as the Laurentian Great Lakes in North America, can be challenging and costly. The bathymetry, the diffuse attenuation coefficient for downwelling irradiance ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K<sub>d</sub></i> ), and the particulate backscattering coefficient ( <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">b<sub>bp</sub></i> ) are important metrics in monitoring water quality in lakes and have typically been measured in two ways: 1) via in situ sampling campaigns, which are expensive, time-consuming, and have low spatial resolution, and 2) via passive optical imagery, which can have errors in excess of 50%. Recently, ICESat-2, an active LiDAR-based satellite, has proven effective in deriving the bathymetry, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">K<sub>d</sub></i> , and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">b<sub>bp</sub></i> in the global oceans. However, validation of such metrics has never been done on satellite flyovers taken on the same day as in situ measurements. Likewise, studies on freshwater environments have been limited. Here, we compare in situ data sampled from Lake Michigan and Big Glen Lake between August 13th and 14th, 2021, and results derived from an ICESat-2 flyover in the same region on August 14th, 2021.We find excellent agreement between the in situ values and the satellite-derived values for all three metrics. This suggests that ICESat-2 and other future LiDAR-based satellites will be powerful tools in monitoring large freshwater lakes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call