Abstract

To study natural ventilation for agricultural buildings, OpenFOAM, an open source CFD code, enables to develop tools that automate complex simulation procedures for nonprofessional CFD users. Prior to developing such tools, this paper investigates the accuracy of simulated air velocity in three test buildings according to different mesh sizes and turbulence models. The computed results, that were obtained using 13 different mesh sizes and 4 different k-ε turbulence models, were qualitatively and quantitatively compared to wind tunnel measurements by two validation metrics. The results showed that the smaller mesh size leads to slightly higher simulation accuracy, but an increase in the number of meshes above a certain level did not improve the simulation accuracy due to the problem of solution convergence. The mesh size larger than 0.25m at building walls was appropriate for the standard k-ε model and the RNG k-ε model, while a small mesh size of 0.125m was preferable for the low Re k-ε model. The simulation results, especially obtained from the RNG k-ε model, were highly influenced by whether the solution converged showing the relative error of on average 6.4% higher in the oscillatory solutions, while those from the low Re k-ε model were more dependent on the mesh size.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.