Abstract

This study was aimed to test the agreement between a manual and an automatic technique in measuring fetal brain volume (FBV) from three-dimensional (3D) fetal head datasets. FBV were acquired independently by two operators from low risk singleton pregnancies at a gestational age between 19 and 34 weeks. FBV measurements were obtained using an automatic software (Smart ICV™) and manually by Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL™). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess reliability, while bias and agreement were evaluate by examining Bland-Altman plots. The time spent in measuring volumes was calculated and values obtained compared. Sixty-three volumes were considered for the study. In all the included volumes successful volume analysis were obtained with both techniques. Smart ICV™ showed a high intra-observer (0.996; 95% CI 0.994-0.998) and inter-observer (ICC 0.995; 95% CI 0.991-0.997). An excellent degree of reliability was found when the two techniques were compared (ICC 0.995; 95% CI 0.987-0.998). The time required to perform FBV was significantly lower for Smart ICV™ than VOCAL™ (8.2 ± 4.5 vs. 121.3 ± 19.0 s; p < 0.0001). The measurement of FBV is feasible with both manual and automatic techniques. Smart ICV™ showed an excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability associated with a valuable agreement with volume measurements obtained manually with VOCAL™. Volumes may be measured significantly faster with smart ICV™ than manually and this automatic software has the potential to become the preferred methods for the assessment of FBV.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call