Abstract

AbstractThis paper reports the development of a ∼30 m resolution two‐dimensional hydrodynamic model of the conterminous U.S. using only publicly available data. The model employs a highly efficient numerical solution of the local inertial form of the shallow water equations which simulates fluvial flooding in catchments down to 50 km2 and pluvial flooding in all catchments. Importantly, we use the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Elevation Dataset to determine topography; the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers National Levee Database to explicitly represent known flood defenses; and global regionalized flood frequency analysis to characterize return period flows and rainfalls. We validate these simulations against the complete catalogue of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) maps and detailed local hydraulic models developed by the USGS. Where the FEMA SFHAs are based on high‐quality local models, the continental‐scale model attains a hit rate of 86%. This correspondence improves in temperate areas and for basins above 400 km2. Against the higher quality USGS data, the average hit rate reaches 92% for the 1 in 100 year flood, and 90% for all flood return periods. Given typical hydraulic modeling uncertainties in the FEMA maps and USGS model outputs (e.g., errors in estimating return period flows), it is probable that the continental‐scale model can replicate both to within error. The results show that continental‐scale models may now offer sufficient rigor to inform some decision‐making needs with dramatically lower cost and greater coverage than approaches based on a patchwork of local studies.

Highlights

  • Large-scale hydraulic analyses have come to the fore in recent years as a result of advances in computational capacity and availability of global terrain data sets [Sampson et al, 2015; Dottori et al, 2016; Winsemius et al, 2013]

  • Sampson et al [2015] compared their global model to three Canadian urban river reaches and two UK catchments, with high-quality flood hazard data provided for these areas by their respective government agencies

  • The H score of 0.815 indicates that over 80% of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) specified by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is captured by the model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large-scale hydraulic analyses have come to the fore in recent years as a result of advances in computational capacity and availability of global terrain data sets [Sampson et al, 2015; Dottori et al, 2016; Winsemius et al, 2013]. Trigg et al [2016] conducted a continent-wide intercomparison of six global model outputs over Africa While they adopted a large-scale validation procedure, the validation data itself are not derived from high-quality flood hazard assessments. Sampson et al [2015] compared their global model to three Canadian urban river reaches and two UK catchments, with high-quality flood hazard data provided for these areas by their respective government agencies. In this instance, the benchmark data were of high quality but not of adequate spatial scale to comprehensively evaluate their global model

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call