Vaginal Repair With Mesh Versus Colporrhaphy for Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

The use of synthetic mesh to augment vaginal repair procedures for pelvic organ prolapse has increased in large part because of dissatisfaction with the success rates of traditional colporrhaphy. Its use, however, is controversial. Four randomized controlled studies comparing traditional colporrhaphy with vaginal repair using mesh augmentation had conflicting results. This unblinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated whether mesh augmentation during vaginal repair would reduce the rate of recurrent prolapse at 12 months compared with traditional colporrhaphy. A total of 139 women with stage 2 or more prolapse who required both anterior and posterior compartment repair were randomized to mesh augmentation (mesh group, n = 69) or colporrhaphy (no mesh group, n = 70). Study subjects were enrolled between 2003 and 2005 at a tertiary teaching hospital. Prolapse was staged using the pelvic-organ-prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. The primary study outcome was objective success of surgery defined as the absence of POP-Q stage 2 or more prolapse at 12 months following surgery. Questionnaires were used to assess secondary outcomes including symptoms, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Of the 139 women, 63 of 69 (93.1%) in the mesh group and 61 of 70 (87.1%) in the no mesh group attended the 12-month follow-up. There was no significant difference at 12 months in objective success (POP-Q stage 0 or 1) between the mesh and no mesh groups (mesh: 81.0% [51/63] vs. no mesh: 65.6% [40/61]; P = 0.07). Although patients in both groups expressed a high level of satisfaction with the surgery and improved symptoms and parameters of quality of life compared to baseline, there was no statistically significant difference in these outcomes between the 2 groups (P = ns). Postoperative complications in the mesh group included four cases (5.6%) of vaginal mesh exposure. At 12 months, de novo dyspareunia was reported in 27.8% (5/18) of the sexually active women without preoperative dyspareunia in the mesh group and in 41.7% (5/12) of those in the no mesh group. These differences were not significant (P = 0.46). These findings show that anterior and posterior vaginal repair with mesh augmentation at 12 months after surgery does not result in significantly less recurrent prolapse than traditional colporrhaphy.