Abstract

AimThe lipophilicity of naproxen by reversed-phase thin-layer chromatography (RP-TLC) and new methods of calculation of partition coefficients were developed. MethodsNaproxen was investigated with the use RP-TLC on RP2 (Kieselgel 60 F254 silanisiert), RP8F254s, RP18F254s, DiolF254s, and CNF254s plates, and methanol–water (pHwater = 2.56; 5.73; 8.50) and 1,4-dioxane–water (pHwater = 5.73) in different volume compositions as the mobile phases. The chromatographic parameters of lipophilicity (RMW) of the studied naproxen were determined and compared both, with measured (logPexp), and calculated partition coefficients (AlogPs, AClogP, AB/logP, miLogP, AlogP, mlogP, logPKowwin, xlogP2, and xlogP3). New methods were proposed for calculation of logP for naproxen using the RF value and the numerical value of topological index (1χ, 2χ, 1χν, oB). ResultsIt was apparent that the lipophilicities RMW(RP18, pH = 2.56), RMW(RP8, pH = 2.56), RMW(RP8, pH = 5.73), RMW(RP8, pH = 8.50), RMW(CN, pH = 2.56), and RMW(RP8, pH = 5.73, d) values were most similar to the experimental partition coefficient. Therefore, the RP8F254s plate is the best for lipophilicity analysis of naproxen. ConclusionThe logP values calculated for naproxen by the use of RF values and topological index oB, using the new approach, correlate the best with experimental partition coefficient.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.