Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the utility of three flight simulator motion conditions (fixed-base, motion-cueing seat, and full-motion) to support training of in-flight rotary-wing emergency recovery procedures. Military helicopter pilots were randomly assigned to two of three possible motion configurations and subject to three in-flight emergencies. Pilot handling ratings indicate wide acceptance of the training device in each of the three configurations. Subjective workload assessments showed no difference between motion configurations. Results will be discussed with reference to the importance of pilot simulator acceptance during flight training.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
