Abstract

IntroductionPerioperative anaphylactic reactions due to drugs and substances associated with general anesthesia can potentially be life‐threatening. The objective of this study was to investigate the significance of the basophil activation test (BAT) for allergy diagnosis work up.MethodsA total of 14 patients (5 men, 9 women; mean age: 57.8 years) with clinical records of anaphylactic reactions under general anesthesia were studied by means of anesthesia records, skin and serological tests. Eleven healthy subjects without any history of allergic sensitization to anaesthetic drugs served as controls. BATs based on stimulation of whole blood cells measuring CD63 activation of basophils and using CCR3 as basophil marker by flow cytometry (Flow CAST®, BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Schönenbuch, Switzerland) were performed with the following substances (in dependence on the history and the skin tests of the patient): analgesics (acetylsalicylic acid, celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, indometacin, metamizole, paracetamol, propyphenazone, tramadol), antibiotics (PPL (benzylpenicilloyl polylysine), MDM (minor determinant mixture), amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, roxithromycin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim), local anesthetics (articaine, bupivacaine, lidocaine, prilocaine, procaine, methyl‐4‐hydroxybenzoate), narcotics and NMBA (atracurium, cisatracurium, etomidate, neostigmine, midazolam, mivacurium, pancuronium, propofol, pyridostigmine, succinylcholine, sufentanil, thiopental, vecuronium), and other individual substances.ResultsThree patients showed positive results in the BAT: One to metamizole, one to PPL, and one to pancuronium. BATs with these substances were negative in controls.ConclusionsThe BAT should be used complementary to skin tests, especially if IgE‐mediated mechanisms are presumed and skin tests are inconclusive. A positive reaction in BAT identifies the culprit agent with high probability.

Highlights

  • Perioperative anaphylactic reactions due to drugs and substances associated with general anesthesia can potentially be life-threatening

  • This study shows a discrepancy between the number of positive reactions in skin testing and number of positive results in basophil activation test (BAT)

  • This might be due to different reasons: On the one hand non-IgE mediated mechanisms or irritative reactions of drugs may lead to positive skin test results which cannot be recovered in vitro

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Perioperative anaphylactic reactions due to drugs and substances associated with general anesthesia can potentially be life-threatening. Methods: A total of 14 patients (5 men, 9 women; mean age: 57.8 years) with clinical records of anaphylactic reactions under general anesthesia were studied by means of anesthesia records, skin and serological tests. A positive reaction in BAT identifies the culprit agent with high probability. An allergy work-up to identify the culprit drugs is required to avoid anaphylactic episodes during anesthesia in the future. Positive reactions to skin tests with anesthetic agents are below 5% in normal controls at defined concentrations, but exceeding the recommended maximum

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call