Abstract
COVID-19 compelled students to participate in a curriculum delivery approach they did not voluntarily choose and therefore may have lacked the technological, logistical, or other capabilities to engage at the highest level. Equally as important, some students may lack comfort with their background surroundings leading to a consistent avoidance of the video option during class. Equity suggests that this should not be a deterrent to their class participation. The result however is often a faculty member teaching to a computer screen populated solely by black squares containing student names. Anecdotal evidence suggests that over time this can also lead to increased student disengagement, both deliberate and inadvertent. This article compares two virtual worlds, Second Life and Roblox, examining their potential for promoting student inclusion and compelling engagement in education. The article will highlight the differences between these worlds, as well as describe their utility as sites for a class activity. Actual curricular examples will be used to illustrate the use of these virtual worlds as a pedagogical tool. Situating a university class in a virtual world as distinct from a virtual classroom is not without its challenges. However, it offers several advantages in the universal effort to increase student engagement and participation coupled with addressing equity and inclusion issues in educational delivery.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.