Abstract

Contraceptive use is deemed one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century because its benefits are universally acknowledged as a cornerstone for reducing global maternal morbidity and mortality. However, although the adoption of the Affordable Care Act in the United States (US) enhanced access to preventive health services, as well as increased contraceptive use, a considerable proportion of reproductive-aged women still have unmet reproductive health needs. Current data indicates gaps in contraceptive use patterns in the US, particularly among low-income women and those from racial/ethnic and gender minority subgroups, necessitating further investigation using an ecological approach. This narrative literature review aims to investigate the current perspective of contraceptive use in the US using the social-ecological model (SEM). Based on SEM levels, barriers to contraceptive use entail the following levels: individual (e.g., misbelief about the side effects of contraceptives), interpersonal (e.g., influence of family and friends), institutional (e.g., lack of training on how to use different types of contraceptives), community (e.g., societal stigma and shame), and policy (e.g., restrictive federal and states policies). Access to contraceptives for women is a system-level issue that necessitates consideration for multilevel strategies by key stakeholders to improve contraceptive uptake among vulnerable populations.

Highlights

  • Contraceptive use is deemed one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century by the United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [1].This is because its benefits are universally acknowledged as a cornerstone for reducing global maternal morbidity and mortality, improving knowledge about health benefits of pregnancy spacing for maternal and child outcomes, mitigating unintended pregnancy, preventing risky sexual behaviors, and reducing the risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections

  • One study found that up to 50% of pediatricians prefer an abstinence-only form of contraception for adolescents, with fewer than 20% discussing any type of Intrauterine device (IUD) [21]

  • This study showed an overwhelmingly low use between intended and actual long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) use as only 8% used a LARC method compared to 52% who intended to use the same [24]

Read more

Summary

A Narrative Literature Review

Ajayi 1,2,3 , Sonya Panjwani 1,2 , Kelly Wilson 1 and Whitney R. Laboratory for Community Health Evaluation and Systems Science (CHESS), Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Direction, Empowerment & Nurturing (EDEN) Foundation, Abuja 900211, Nigeria

Introduction
Literature Review
Method
Individual-Level Factors
Interpersonal-Level Factors
Institutional-Level Factors
Community-Level Factors
Policy-Level Factors
Facilitators of Contraceptive Use
Recommendations to Increase Contraceptive Use
Policy Implications
Limitations
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call