Abstract

Short-term power system operational planning problems that consider multi-stage uncertainties pose significant challenges, not only in the design of tractable optimization frameworks for implementing them, but also in the testing and benchmarking of such frameworks. This paper presents an implementation using the open-source M atpower Optimal Scheduling Tool (MOST) to study and compare a stochastic day-ahead, security-constrained unit commitment problem with a more traditional deterministic approach. The comparison is based on a testing methodology for day-ahead plans designed to produce expected performance estimates with minimal biases from modeling assumptions. Emphasis is given in the proposed stochastic approach to explicit modeling of the operational characteristics of the technologies available, their spatial and temporal coupling, and the regulatory constraints that assure reliability and adequacy. The problem formulations and testing methodology are described and simulation results from MOST are presented, with discussion of implications for future market design. All of the code and data to replicate the simulations is provided online.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.