Abstract

ABSTRACTCloud forecasts pose a particularly difficult challenge to verification through the three‐dimensional structure of cloud. Two‐dimensional total cloud forecasts from one convection‐permitting and one near‐convection‐resolving Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) model are compared to a cloud analysis using the Method for Object‐based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) and MODE Time Domain (TD) which is currently being developed to also consider the time dimension. This study attempts to quantify the spatial and temporal evolution of specifically persistent (static) and systematic cloud scenarios where the cloud boundaries change only slowly. These scenarios can lead to significant cloud and temperature errors if the locations of these boundaries are not well forecast. MODE and MODE TD are used to identify and compare the number of cloud free objects, their evolution over time in terms of area or volume. The results show that including the time dimension provides a different perspective to the assessment, but that the choice of method‐specific parameters is critical for enabling the matching of time objects. Crucially, model‐relative behaviour can be isolated, and the specific characteristics of the cloud analyses are also quantifiable, and need to be accounted for when interpreting results. Copyright © 2013 Royal Meteorological Society and British Crown copyright, the Met Office

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.