Abstract
The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) and the Waterloo Footedness Questionnaire (WFQ) are two of the most widely used questionnaires to assess lateralized everyday behavior in human participants. However, it is unclear to what extent the specific behavior assessed in these questionnaires elicit lateralized neural activity when performed in real-life situations. To illuminate this unresolved issue, we assessed EEG alpha and beta asymmetries during real-life performance of the behaviors assessed in the EHI and WFQ using a mobile EEG system. This methodology provides high ecological validity for studying neural correlates of motor behavior under more naturalistic conditions. Our results indicate that behavioral performance of items of both the EHI and WFQ differentiate between left- and right-handers and left- and right-footers on the neural level, especially in the alpha frequency band. These results were unaffected by movement parameters. Furthermore, we could demonstrate that neural activity elicited specifically during left-sided task performance provides predictive power for the EHI or WFQ score of the participants. Overall, our results show that these prominent questionnaires not only distinguish between different motor preferences on the behavioral level, but also on the neurophysiological level. Furthermore, we could show that mobile EEG systems are a powerful tool to investigate motor asymmetries in ecologically valid situations outside of the laboratory setting. Future research should focus on other lateralized behavioral phenotypes in real-life settings to provide more insights into lateralized motor functions.
Highlights
Most humans consistently prefer one hand or one foot over the other in everyday life (Porac and Coren, 1981; Güntürkün and Ocklenburg, 2017)
We investigated the neurophysiological correlates of the most prominent handedness and footedness questionnaires—the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) and the Waterloo Footedness Questionnaire (WFQ)—in a real-life setting with high ecological validity
Our results show that alpha power asymmetries at the FC5/FC6 electrode sites distinguished significantly between leftand right-handers for EHI items
Summary
Most humans consistently prefer one hand or one foot over the other in everyday life (Porac and Coren, 1981; Güntürkün and Ocklenburg, 2017). Both human handedness and footedness are among the most well-studied lateralized behaviors. A substantial sample of 3307 participants was investigated regarding their footedness by Coren (1993) He found that 86.7% of all participants were right-preferent, 7.1% were left-preferent, and 6.2% had no foot preference. This finding effectively demonstrates a similar distribution as was identified for handedness. These measures are generally positively correlated in individuals supporting this finding (Porac and Coren, 1981; Brown and Taylor, 1988; Reiss et al, 1999; Dittmar, 2002; Ocklenburg and Güntürkün, 2009)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have