Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are subject to many sources of uncertainty, limiting their application in research and practice. One of their main limitations is the quality of the distributional data used to calibrate them, which directly influences the accuracy of model predictions. We propose a standardized methodology to create maps, describing the limitations of occurrence data for covering the distribution of a species. We develop a set of tools based on the general framework of Maps of Biogeographical Ignorance to describe the main sources of data‐driven uncertainty: taxonomic stability, environmental similarity, geographical proximity and temporal decay of the underlying biodiversity data. The so‐derived indicators of data‐driven uncertainty account for inventory completeness, taxonomic quality, time since the surveys and geographical (and environmental) distance to localities with information. These indicators form the basis of ignorance maps, which can be used to visualize the reliability of SDM projections in geographical space, to estimate the uncertainty of these predictions and to identify target survey areas. To demonstrate the application of our approach, we use data on fourteen Iberian species of Scarabaeidae dung beetles. Data‐driven uncertainty is widespread even for this well‐surveyed group; more than 60% of the region has distributional uncertainty values higher than 0.6, and 30% higher than 0.7. Ignorance maps can be jointly evaluated with SDM predictions to generate spatially explicit maps of uncertainty, identifying where predictions are reliable/unreliable. Neglecting such uncertainty can severely affect SDM effectiveness, as it can introduce biases and inaccuracies into the measured species–environment relationships. These errors could result in incorrect theoretical or practical applications, including ill‐advised conservation actions. We therefore advocate for the routine use of ignorance maps or similar techniques as supporting information in SDM applications.

Highlights

  • Conservation science has been framed as a crisis discipline, where rapid decisions often need to be made on the basis of old, limited and incomplete data (Soulé 1985)

  • We develop a set of tools based on the general framework of Maps of Biogeographical Ignorance to describe the main sources of data-driven uncertainty: taxonomic stability, environmental similarity, geographical proximity and temporal decay of the underlying biodiversity data

  • species distributions models (SDMs) are closely related to Environmental Niche Models and Habitat Suitability Models; these three terms are often treated as synonyms, we favour SDMs as it unequivocally indicates that the modelled phenomena are species distributions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conservation science has been framed as a crisis discipline, where rapid decisions often need to be made on the basis of old, limited and incomplete data (Soulé 1985). In the case of SDMs, uncertainties are introduced in all stages of the modelling process, including the spatial precision and selection of distributional data and the ancillary variables used as predictors, the algorithms used for modelling, model evaluation, model projection into geographical space, or the application of thresholds to distinguish areas of predicted presence (Heikkinen et al 2006, Hortal et al 2008, DinizFilho et al 2009, Buisson et al 2010, Grenouillet et al 2011, Watling et al 2015, Tessarolo et al 2021) Such issues are not solely of academic interest; SDM outputs are frequently taken at face value (Wilson 2010), potentially leading to the ineffective use of limited conservation resources

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call