Abstract

This study aimed to identify misconceptions in medical student knowledge by mining user interactions in the MedU online learning environment. Data from 13000 attempts at a single virtual patient case were extracted from the MedU MySQL database. A subgroup discovery method was applied to identify patterns in learner-generated annotations and responses to multiple-choice items on the diagnosis and management of acute myocardial infarction (i.e., heart attack). First, the algorithm generated rules where single terms from the learner annotations were used to predict incorrect answers to the multiple-choice items. Second, the possible combinations of terms and their relevant synonyms were used to determine whether their inclusion led to better rates of prediction. The second step was found to significantly increase prediction precision and weighted relative accuracy, uncovering four misconceptions at a rate greater than 70%. These findings serve to inform the design of an adaptive system that tailors the delivery of formative feedback to promote better learning outcomes in the domain of clinical reasoning.

Highlights

  • IntroductionA study of first- and second-year medical students showed that half of first-year students held one or more misconceptions prior to attending a course on the cardiovascular system, with this number only decreasing slightly in their second year of study (Ahopelto, Mikkalä-Erdmann, Olkinuora, & Kääpä, 2011)

  • Many students enter medical school with misconceptions that are resistant to change

  • From step 1 to step 2 of the subgroup discovery algorithm, there was a significant increase in the precision of detecting errors, t(44) = -10.73, p < .0005 and in the weighted relative accuracy, t(44) = 2.61, p = .01, but no significant change to either accuracy, t(44) = -1.62, p = .11, or coverage, t(44) = 1.42, p =

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A study of first- and second-year medical students showed that half of first-year students held one or more misconceptions prior to attending a course on the cardiovascular system, with this number only decreasing slightly in their second year of study (Ahopelto, Mikkalä-Erdmann, Olkinuora, & Kääpä, 2011). Students who held such misconceptions performed poorly on a related clinical reasoning task, supporting the fundamental role of knowledge in developing clinical reasoning expertise (Norman, 2005).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call