Abstract

Enrollments in Mechanical Engineering programs continue to increase. Unfortunately, increases in faculty size have not kept pace at many universities, resulting in large course enrollments in even junior- and senior-level major courses. The primary goals of this study were to increase (or at least maintain) the quality of instruction, and increase student competency and understanding in a large lecture course having the same instructional personnel resources as a course with 60% of the enrollment. Hybrid and problem-based learning techniques, along with two optional weekly recitation sessions and an online discussion forum were incorporated into the course to meet these goals. The course, a classical controls course, is one in which course concepts are generally considered to be a bit abstract to a considerable percentage of the class. The instructor had previously taught the course several times, so a well-paced course schedule and solid foundation of course notes were already in place. Student evaluation instruments in previous offerings included weekly homework, bi-weekly short quizzes, two exams and the final exam. For the large lecture course (with an enrollment of 84 students), the evaluation instruments (homework, quizzes and exams) remained the same; however, the students formed self-selected triad teams. Approximately two-thirds of the quizzes, one-half of the homework and sixty percent of the final exam questions were assigned to the triad teams (the balance and both mid-term exams were individual submissions). The primary advantages of group quizzes and assignments were multi-fold: they facilitated group learning and peer-teaching to reinforce course concepts and allowed the instructor and teaching assistant to give the type of detailed feedback on submissions that would have been difficult or impossible to give on 84 individual submissions. Course notes (including short Echo360 modules), handouts and homework and quiz solutions were maintained on an online course management system (i.e., Blackboard); additionally, the use of an online threaded discussion forum, Piazza, allowed students to post/answer questions (anonymously, if desired) and follow discussions about course content. Team-based learning techniques were heavily used in latter course topics; the assigned readings, along with online course notes were used to prepare the students for the individual readiness assessment tests (RATs). Students discussed their answers on the RAT instruments in their triad groups (another opportunity for peer teaching) and disclosed group answers (which generally reflected a much higher level of understanding) to the entire class. Student assessment of course techniques and a comparison of traditional (lecture-based) and hybrid-/problem-based techniques will be used to assess the efficacy of the problem-based approach and to suggest improvements for future offerings.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call