Abstract

This study explores how formal measures of landscape wildness (i.e. absence of human artefacts, perceived naturalness of land cover, remoteness from mechanised access, and ruggedness of the terrain) correlate with crowdsourced measures of landscape aesthetic quality as captured in Scenic-Or-Not data for Great Britain. It evaluates multiple linear regression (MLR) and two spatially varying coefficients models: geographically weighted regression (GWR) and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR). The MLR provided a baseline model in an analysis of national data, exhibiting the presence of spatially autocorrelated residuals and suggesting that geographically weighted models may be appropriate. A standard GWR was found to exacerbate local collinearity between covariates, both overfitting and underfitting the model with highly varied and localised results. This was due to its single one-size-fits-all bandwidth and the assumption that all relationships between the target and predictor variables operate over the same spatial scale. MGWR relaxes this assumption by determining parameter-specific bandwidths, mitigating the local collinearity issues found in a standard GWR and resulting in more spatially stable and consistent coefficient estimates. The findings also indicated that the relationship between some covariates (such as remoteness) and perceived landscape quality varied little spatially, while clear gradients were found for other covariates. For example, naturalness was stronger in the north and west, ruggedness was stronger in the south and east, and the absence of human artefacts was weaker in Scotland and the north than in England and the south. Overall, the study showed that MGWR is more sensitive than GWR to the spatial heterogeneity in the statistical relationships between landscape factors and public perceptions. These findings provide nuanced understandings of how these relationships vary spatially, underscoring the value of such approaches in landscape scale analyses to support policy and planning. The discussion section of this paper considers the MGWR as the default geographically weighted model, assessing the potential for the use of crowdsourced data in landscape studies. In so doing, it illustrates how such approaches could be used to explore both subjective and objective landscape evaluations.

Highlights

  • The aesthetic quality of landscapes has a clear positive correlation with human health and well-being, and aesthetics have been recognised as a key benefit of landscapes in ecosystem service modelling (Zoderer, Tasser, Carver, & Tappeiner, 2019)

  • This study explored the relationships between crowdsourced measures of perceived landscape scenic beauty as captured in the Scenic-OrNot dataset, alongside components of formal landscape wildness

  • It used both non-spatial and spatial regression (GWR and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR)) models. The results of this analysis illustrate the limitations of a standard geographically weighted regression (GWR), which is liable to overfit some variables while underfitting others

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aesthetic quality of landscapes has a clear positive correlation with human health and well-being, and aesthetics have been recognised as a key benefit of landscapes in ecosystem service modelling (Zoderer, Tasser, Carver, & Tappeiner, 2019). The objectivist paradigm is based on landscape’s visual properties and biophysical features, often as defined by specialists such as landscape architects. This is the most prevalent approach in formal landscape assessment practices. There is a general consensus is that landscape quality is derived from the interaction between biophysical and perceived components (Daniel, 2001). Integrated approaches linking both subjectivist and objectivist considerations provide a basis for enhancing landscape planning and decision making, and an analytical framework is needed to link the two paradigms and handle discrepancies between them. Effective landscape assessments involving both expert and non-expert perspectives pose a challenge, as demonstrated by the landscape character assessments (LCA) (Swanwick, 2002) in the

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call