Abstract
We present three (main one and two auxiliary) fuzzy algorithms to stratify observations in homogenous classes. These algorithms modify, upgrade and fuzzify crisp algorithms from our earlier works on a medical case study to select the most appropriate surgical treatment for patients with ischemic heart disease complicated with significant chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Those patients can be treated with either surgical revascularization and mitral valve repair (group A) or with isolated surgical revascularization (group B) depending on their health status. The main algorithm results in a fuzzy partition of patients in two fuzzy sets (groups A and B) through identification of their degrees of membership. The resulting groups are highly non-homogenous, which impedes subsequent proper comparisons. So, the two auxiliary algorithms further stratify each group into two homogenous subgroups with comparatively preserved medical condition (A1 and B1) and with comparatively deteriorated medical condition (A2 and B2). Those two algorithms perform fuzzy partition of patients from A and B respectively into A1, A2, B1 and B2 by identifying their conditional degrees of membership to those subgroups. We then utilize the product t-norm to calculate the degree of membership of patients to their respective subgroup as an intersection of two fuzzy sets. We demonstrate how to form fuzzy samples for medical parameters for any subgroup. We also compare the performance of the fuzzy algorithms with their preceding crisp version, as well as with eight Bayesian classifiers. We then assess the quality of classification by modified confusion matrices, summarized further into four criteria. The fuzzy algorithms show total superiority over the other methods, and excellent differentiation of typical patients and outliers. On top, only the fuzzy algorithms provide a measure of how typical a patient is to its subgroup. The fuzzy algorithms clearly outline the role of the Heart Team, which is missing in the Bayesian classifiers.
Highlights
IntroductionThe ischemic heart disease (IHD) is considered one of the most widely spread heart disease globally
The ischemic heart disease (IHD) is considered one of the most widely spread heart disease globally. When it is further complicated with ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR, referred as functional mitral regurgitation in recent works—FMR), the mitral valve (MV, between the left atrium and left ventricle) does not function well and part of the blood pumped from the left ventricle returns to the left atrium
To summarize the information from the modified confusion matrices, we introduce four criteria: 1) K1—the percentage of the nonrejected patients; 2) K2 —the percentage of the correctly classified patients out of all non-rejected typical patients; 3) K3—the percentage of the patients correctly classified as outliers from groups: MVRepair + CABG (group A)
Summary
The ischemic heart disease (IHD) is considered one of the most widely spread heart disease globally. When it is further complicated with ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR, referred as functional mitral regurgitation in recent works—FMR), the mitral valve (MV, between the left atrium and left ventricle) does not function well and part of the blood pumped from the left ventricle returns to the left atrium. Patients with severe IMR (which includes 3th to 4th degree and 4th degree IMR), are traditionally subjected to operation using MV repair performed as a concomitant procedure with surgical revascularization (MVRepair + CABG) [6,7,8,9,10,11]. In the rest of the paper, the term IMR will refer to significant chronic IMP
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have