Abstract

Home range estimators are a critical component for understanding animal spatial ecology. The choice of home range estimator in spatial ecology studies can significantly influence management and conservation actions, as different methods lead to vastly different interpretations of movement patterns, habitat selection, as well as home range requirements. Reptile studies in particular have struggled to reach a consensus on the appropriate home range estimators to use, and species with cryptic behavior make home range assessment difficult. We applied dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models (dBBMMs) to radio-telemetry data from Ophiophagus hannah, a wide-ranging snake species. We used two focal individuals at different life stages (one juvenile male and one adult male) and sought to identify whether the method would accurately represent both their home range and movement patterns. To assess the suitability of dBBMMs, we compared this novel method with traditional home range estimation methods: minimum convex polygons (MCP) and Kernel density estimators (KDE). Both KDE and MCP incorporated higher levels of Type I and Type II errors, which would lead to biases in our understanding of this species space-use and habitat selection. Although these methods identified some general spatial-temporal patterns, dBBMMs were more efficient at detecting movement corridors and accurately representing long-term shelters sites, showing an improvement over methods traditionally favored in reptile studies. The additional flexibility of the dBBMM approach in providing insight into movement patterns can help further improve conservation and management actions. Additionally, our results suggest that dBBMMs may be more widely applicable in studies that rely on VHF telemetry and not limited to studies employing GPS tags.

Highlights

  • Home range estimators are widely used in spatial ecology studies, as they provide basic measurements of animal space-use patterns

  • Based on the suggestions of [57], we propose that the suitability of dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models (dBBMMs) compared with other methods should be based on (1) home range estimate optimization, (2) ability to classify high and low-use areas, (3) identification of general patterns of habitat selection versus availability, and (4) insight into variation of movement and habitat selection over spatio-temporal scales

  • Different home range estimators will provide varying information related to an animal’s spatial ecology; and, when choosing a method during exploratory analyses, it is important to focus on what research questions are asked [33]

Read more

Summary

Objectives

We aimed to compare how different home range estimators correctly identified these long-term shelter sites, any potential habitat selection and the movement corridors used by our two focal O. hannah individuals. As one of our goals was to compare used habitat with available habitat for each individual (50% versus 99% isopleths), overestimated core areas led to biases in our understanding of their habitat selection

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call