Abstract

BackgroundRecent advances in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technology have led to more effective approaches for measuring changes in peptide/protein abundances in biological samples. Label-free LC-MS methods have been used for extraction of quantitative information and for detection of differentially abundant peptides/proteins. However, difference detection by analysis of data derived from label-free LC-MS methods requires various preprocessing steps including filtering, baseline correction, peak detection, alignment, and normalization. Although several specialized tools have been developed to analyze LC-MS data, determining the most appropriate computational pipeline remains challenging partly due to lack of established gold standards.ResultsThe work in this paper is an initial study to develop a simple model with "presence" or "absence" condition using spike-in experiments and to be able to identify these "true differences" using available software tools. In addition to the preprocessing pipelines, choosing appropriate statistical tests and determining critical values are important. We observe that individual statistical tests could lead to different results due to different assumptions and employed metrics. It is therefore preferable to incorporate several statistical tests for either exploration or confirmation purpose.ConclusionsThe LC-MS data from our spike-in experiment can be used for developing and optimizing LC-MS data preprocessing algorithms and to evaluate workflows implemented in existing software tools. Our current work is a stepping stone towards optimizing LC-MS data acquisition and testing the accuracy and validity of computational tools for difference detection in future studies that will be focused on spiking peptides of diverse physicochemical properties in different concentrations to better represent biomarker discovery of differentially abundant peptides/proteins.

Highlights

  • Recent advances in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-Mass spectrometry (MS)) technology have led to more effective approaches for measuring changes in peptide/protein abundances in biological samples

  • We present a spike-in experiment to evaluate the performance of four software tools in detecting “true differences” in peptide abundance between two datasets acquired using a label-free Liquid chromatography (LC)-MS method

  • The performance of each tool is assessed by their ability to detect spike-in peptides as true differences between two groups on the basis of MS1-level ion abundance measurements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent advances in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technology have led to more effective approaches for measuring changes in peptide/protein abundances in biological samples. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has been an indispensable tool for profiling small differences in expression level of peptides/proteins in complex biological medium [5,6,7,8]. This is due to the development of soft ionization techniques and tandem mass spectrometry, which makes it a sensitive tool for detecting and identifying peptides. A typical LC-MS-based proteomics study includes sample preparation, separation of peptides/proteins on a single or multiple HPLC columns, ionization of chromatographic elutes by ESI source (electrospray ionization), detection of multiple charged peptides/proteins by mass spectrometry and subsequent data analysis

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.