Abstract

I describe the implementation of a class wiki in an introductory linguistics class. There were two pedagogical goals: (1) facilitate asynchronous student engagement and collaborative learning; (2) provide opportunities for students to engage with various linguistic issues having to do with justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. Assessment for the wiki was done using a version of specifications grading (Nilson 2015), so that students could choose their level of engagement with the wiki. A full description of the wiki is available at https://cbjorndahl.github.io/CMUNoLWiki/, which includes detailed descriptions, learning objectives, and prompts given to students for each wiki cate-gory. The present paper focusses primarily on the pedagogical motivations, design of the pedagogical intervention, and a reflection of its effectiveness.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAll but one of the wiki categories, listed in (2), were designed so that students would either be engaging with linguistic diversity, or explicitly tackling JEDI issues directly

  • I teach an introductory linguistics course (80-180) that is offered every semester at CMU, with a cap of 120 students

  • There is no literature that discusses using wikis to tackle JEDI issues in educational settings, but when considered in light of the pedagogical goal to expose students to a wide variety of language topics that interface with JEDI issues, the use of a student-constructed knowledge bank seems appropriate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All but one of the wiki categories, listed in (2), were designed so that students would either be engaging with linguistic diversity, or explicitly tackling JEDI issues directly. This feature of the wiki is of particular importance since, given the demographics of the class, most. There is no literature that discusses using wikis to tackle JEDI issues in educational settings, but when considered in light of the pedagogical goal to expose students to a wide variety of language topics that interface with JEDI issues, the use of a student-constructed knowledge bank seems appropriate. This setup was motivated by specifications-based grading models (Nilson 2015)

Contribution Article Expansion
Articles Expansions Additional content Total WikiPoints
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.