Abstract
ObjectivesTo understand users’ perceptions about receiving their personalized depression risk score and to gain an understanding about how to improve the efficiency of risk communication from the user perspective.MethodsA qualitative study embedded in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on evaluating the impact of providing personalized depression risk information on psychological harms and benefits. The participants (20 males and 20 females) were randomly selected from the intervention arm of the RCT after the 12-month assessment. The qualitative interviews were conducted through telephone, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We conducted a content analysis to describe the content and contextual meaning of data collected from participants.ResultsThe first theme explained the motivation for receiving a risk score. Most participants chose to receive their personalised depression risk score with the goal of improving their self-awareness. The results revealed three sub-themes surrounding perceptions and implication of receiving their risk score: positive, negative, and neutral. Most participants found that receiving their score was positive because it improved their awareness of their mental health, but some participants could see that some people would have negative feelings when getting the score causing them to be more likely to get depression. The final theme focussed on improvements including: the best delivery methods, having resources and strategies, and targeting younger people.ConclusionThe most significant motivation for, and benefit of receiving one’s personalized depression risk score was improved awareness of one’s mental health. A comprehensive risk communication program may improve the uptake and maximize the impact on behavior changes and risk reduction.
Highlights
Depression is a prevalent affective disorder, and it accounts for 4.3% of all global disability life years [1]
Data analysis Our analysis focused on the impact that receiving personalized depression risk information had on participants; content analysis was performed to describe the content and contextual meaning of the data [27, 28]
The first theme relates to why participants chose to receive their depression risk scores
Summary
Depression is a prevalent affective disorder, and it accounts for 4.3% of all global disability life years [1]. In Canada, people aged 15 and older have a 4.7% annual prevalence of depression, which lead to an economic burden of over $12 billion per year across Canada [2]. Depression has a drastic effect on an individual’s physical and mental health leading to psychophysical diseases, disability and increased mortality risk. Successful implementation of self-help strategies relies on researchers’ capability of estimating one’s baseline risk and effectively communicate such risk information to the users. The estimated risk has a number of applications [3]. One application is risk communication; the risk information is communicated to users to inform decision making, raise
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call