Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of bioelectrical impedance (BIA) (TANITA Body Fat Analyzer-Model TBF 105, TANITA Corporation of America, Inc.; Skokie, Illinois) as a method of estimating body composition(BC) when compared to hydrostatic weighing (HW) in an obese population. Fifty-three obese women (43±0.7% fat, 47.3±1.3 yrs) and 15 age matched controls (26.1±1.7% fat, 47.1±2.9 yrs) were studied. The obese subjects were randomly divided into 1 of 4 groups, with BC measurements made pre- and post-12 week intervention: Diet (D) alone (1,200 kcal/day), exercise (E) alone (five 45 min sessions/wk at 78.4±0.6% max HR), both diet and exercise (DE) and controls (C) (no diet or exercise). Lean body mass(LBM), fat mass (FM) and body fat (BF) were estimated from BIA and HW. For all subjects combined, estimation of BF by BIA and HW was highly correlated(r=0.90, p<0.001). Mean values for BF were significantly different between HW and BIA (43.9±0.7% and 48.6±1.2%, p<0.05), respectively. When comparing DE and C, the change in BF over time was significantly higher when using BIA (8.2±0.9%) compared to HW (4.6±0.5%). In summary, cross sectionally, a high correlation was found between BIA and HW in estimating BF; however, BIA tended to overestimate BF in obese women by 4.7±1.3%. In addition, BIA tended to overestimate changes in BF across time in a dieting obese population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Medicine &amp Science in Sports &amp Exercise
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.